Storm vs. Doomsday

Started by Soljer13 pages

Doomsday in a stomp.

Spite thread.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Not writers....THEE writer.

And it's the Marvel handbook entry, Galactic core included.

Oh, and Creshock, go pick up Uncanny 99 and tell me what you see. 😂

ermmhappy

I see something that got retconned in classic X-Men #7, Which was a rerelease of the same story by the same writer later on that depicts events happening differently.

The retcon means the events of Uncanny X-Men never happened.

Here take a look:

Originally posted by ExodusCloak
True, I think the One instance where she did control a solar wind was retconned though. In Classic X-Men...it's been re-written into lightning...instead of a Solar Wind.

Uncanny #99(June 1976)

Retcon takes place in Classic X-Men #7(March 1987)

Claremont wrote both issues.

The events as they occured in 1976 were over ridden by the events in 1987.

That;s what a retcon means.

Nope, not what I see.

I see it's still shows her controlling the Solar winds.

Go pick it up.ermmhappy

Hmm no cat pictures?

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Nope, not what I see.

I see it's still shows her controlling the Solar winds.

Go pick it up.ermmhappy

Then I suggest you pick up X-Men Classics #7 which retconned that. It doesn't depict her contorolling solar winds. but using her backpack manuvering thrusters.

Sorry, that's the current continuity. She never in continuity used solar iwnds in that situation.

You denying it doesn't mean the retcon didn't happen. Sorry, no solar winds (Which weren't even depicted in UXM#99 anyway. Just the writer who knows nothing about physics, who changed what happened in the retcon.) 🙂

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Nope, not what I see.

I see it's still shows her controlling the Solar winds.

Go pick it up.ermmhappy

Son of a......!!! 😠

I'd BFR this guy's face with a solid right hook if granted the chance....

Nothing personal, 2damn... It's just beneficial for this thread's health. 😖hifty:

Originally posted by Creshosk
Then I suggest you pick up X-Men Classics #7 which retconned that. It doesn't depict her contorolling solar winds. but using her backpack manuvering thrusters.

Sorry, that's the current continuity. She never in continuity used solar iwnds in that situation.

You denying it doesn't mean the retcon didn't happen. Sorry, no solar winds (Which weren't even depicted in UXM#99 anyway. Just the writer who knows nothing about physics, who changed what happened in the retcon.) 🙂

Nothing else but that diverges from the original story soooo.....

Go pic up the book nd stop holding on to a damn dream.

We don't see her doing anything but solar winds.

Uncanny# 99 solar winds FTW

I hope this gets closed.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Nothing else but that diverges from the original story soooo.....

Go pic up the book nd stop holding on to a damn dream.

We don't see her doing anything but solar winds.

Uncanny# 99 solar winds FTW

You're the one that's holding onto a dream. Sorry, it was retconned out of occuring

http://img154.imageshack.us/my.php?image=classicxmen0712oq0ic9.jpg

Not that it was ever accuratly depicted in the first place, since her space suit would have been fried off of her if she summoned a stream of super heater plasma to her... Which she clearly didn't do.

IT was just Claremont misunderstanding the misnomer of "Solar winds" which have nothing to do with wind. 🙂

Deny it all you want, but it was retconned, and you're the one holding onto something that never happened. 🙂

Originally posted by endrict
I hope this gets closed.

Originally posted by Creshosk
You're the one that's holding onto a dream. Sorry, it was retconned out of occuring

http://img154.imageshack.us/my.php?image=classicxmen0712oq0ic9.jpg

Not that it was ever accuratly depicted in the first place, since her space suit would have been fried off of her if she summoned a stream of super heater plasma to her... Which she clearly didn't do.

IT was just Claremont misunderstanding the misnomer of "Solar winds" which have nothing to do with wind. 🙂

Deny it all you want, but it was retconned, and you're the one holding onto something that never happened. 🙂

Yea, but Classic X-men and the original for her summoning millions of whole stars(not just the solar winds) go hand in hand so obviously "physics" don't matter when Storm uses her powers.

HoF expertly thrashed Exoduscloak in that other thread about this so-called retcon.

Here.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=8209514&highlight=solar+wind+retcon#post8209514

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Yea, but Classic X-men and the original for her summoning millions of whole stars(not just the solar winds) go hand in hand so obviously "physics" don't matter when Storm uses her powers.

HoF expertly thrashed Exoduscloak in that other thread about this so-called retcon.

Here.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=8209514&highlight=solar+wind+retcon#post8209514

I'm guessing that was pointed to rutog's post since it was pointed to rutog's post. But how does storm's ignorance and delusion's of grandeur prove anything?

Sorry, but like I tell other people, unless you're a credible source your words without proof do not constitute as evidence. Storm saying she'll evolve into a godess doesn't prove anything.

and I didn't see anything that proved the retcon didn't happen... so keep grasping at straws:

There were no solar winds

Originally posted by Creshosk
I'm guessing that was pointed to rutog's post since it was pointed to rutog's post. But how does storm's ignorance and delusion's of grandeur prove anything?

Sorry, but like I tell other people, unless you're a credible source your words without proof do not constitute as evidence. Storm saying she'll evolve into a godess doesn't prove anything.

and I didn't see anything that proved the retcon didn't happen... so keep grasping at straws:

There were no solar winds

There was this:

and this:

What in the ****ing world?

MillionS of Sun S

Not just one solar wind.

DD pwns Storm. The guy in my sig would do it even easier.

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
What in the ****ing world?

Fanboys maybe?

Originally posted by 2damnloud
*snip*
And?

She claimed to be a goddess when xavier. She's not so her hyperbole doesn't count for shit other than pretty words. using misnomer scientific terms only makes you, and claremont, look like idiots. I'd advise you to stop doing it, but trolling is your goal.

Originally posted by Creshosk
And?

She claimed to be a goddess when xavier. She's not so her hyperbole doesn't count for shit other than pretty words. using misnomer scientific terms only makes you, and claremont, look like idiots. I'd advise you to stop doing it, but trolling is your goal.

Can't dispute the fact that the Galactic core is in continuity which is>>> than a mere solar wind.

You also can't dispute the fact that all Uncanny #99 show her manipulating what?? OMG! a Solar Wind.

CC wouldn't retcon that for scientific impossibilites and have her doing something even MORE grand which is also in continuity AND he also has her mentioning the prior Solar wind feat in that same issue.

Lobdell was just the icing on the cake.

She is mistress of the Cosmic storm.

You lose.