Originally posted by Creshosk
[B]You haven't even tried anything else. So you're a mind reader now that knows exactly what I'm going to say and what I'm going to do?
I'm fairly confident that I could predict your next ten posts with 90% accuracy or greater. It doesn't take a mind reader to forecast the future of a one-note joke.
I find it funny that you can read my mind and know what I won't accept, but can't seem to come up with an answer of what I will despite me telling you multiple times now.
Alot of clownish dancing around the question to avoid providing evidence of claims.
Is this how I am expected to respond to you? I make a claim and then dance around challenges to it by telling you what you won't accept and asking repeatedly what you will?
And then I should start talking about random things in an attempt to confuse the issue and you? All while happily providing the same amount of evidence as you? None. And appearently repeatedly calling you a liar is a valid argument?
I don't agree with you therefore you must be a liar?
What is your reasoning for such behavior to be acceptable?
Originally posted by KK the GreatThen what's the point of you even being in here to debate?
I'm fairly confident that I could predict your next ten posts with 90% accuracy or greater. It doesn't take a mind reader to forecast the future of a one-note joke.
I have no idea what you two are going to do next. I still haven't gotten the evidence I want outside of the mention of some documents that you didn't link to.
But why are you in the thread if you already know what your oposition is going to say? Doesn't that make posting rahter boring?
Or are you having fun confirming your predictions while keeping the thread violently disrupted?
Originally posted by KK the Great
Are you accusing me of forging documents?I'd certainly hope you would provide proof of such a strong charge.
Originally posted by KK the Great
By the by, I would indeed be a third-party source, being that I am neither Dan Jurgens nor a representative of Marvel Entertainment.What do you think third-party means, exactly?
You are no way in hell a third party I'd trust. Now quit trolling.
Originally posted by KK the GreatBecause some random poster who kept procrastinating and procrastinating, even attacking me on occasions and made some vauge threats against my family who clearly by what I just mentioned did NOT do any outside research, made some weird image using a literal phrasing of my words is to be believed?
That's the rub, isn't it?
No I'm sorry, Troll, no more food for you, you go on ignore now. ESPECIALLY for that wierd threat against my family. I've tolerated your attempts to disrupt the thread for too long.
Originally posted by KK the GreatI don't find you any more intelligent than Silent Master. I provided step by step reasons why I said Dan jurgens was strong armed. He even says in his recant, that AFTER a firestorm of controversy he felt the need to clear some things up. He goes on to not blame the interviewer and relieve him of the ownus and then turn around and says we.... ****ed up. There is never absolute proof of anything. We would accept a video tape or tape recorder as absolute proof. This is why there is reasonable doubt. I have reasonable doubt of Dan's statement given the entire interview and what was said by both parties AFTER the interview. Thus me making the statement that Dan was forced by Marvel to recant is NOT a lie. It would be no different than me saying there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Which we dont' know for sure do we? We never will. But the evidence and circumstances behind the history of the bushes, in conjuction with what is happening now lead me to believe there never was. Would someone say I was lying when I say there are no weapons of mass destruction? Probably not. But, there could actually be, or could have been. There is no absolute way to know. Now did I lie? Lying is the purposeful or willful attempt to cover the truth, say the complete opposite of what is believed to be the truth, or to decieve. None of those were my intent when I said what I said. My Intent was to merely state what was true based upon my extremely reasonable reasoning skills.
Let's not BS, guy. You put me on ignore because I make you doubt what tenuous belief you have in your own facade of intelligence. Silent Master doesn't, and you can push him around, so you get to continue feeling good about yourself.