INFO on VOLUME 3
http://tv.ign.com/articles/841/841573p2.html
IGN TV: What can you say about the fates of Nathan and Niki?
Kring: Well, my answer to that is it doesn't look good! [Laughs] It looks pretty dire. But as we've seen on Heroes, death is one of those things that's very, shall we say, fluid. So I would not completely count them out.
IGN TV: Some fans are wondering if Claire's blood is too much of a miracle cure. I'm assuming that's something you've thought about as well?
Kring: Yes. There's only so many times you can go to certain wells or it gets tempting to take the easy route. There's a few other tricks up our sleeve in that respect. The fans should just know that Volume 3, "Villains", when we hit the ground running is going to be pretty high velocity. While that doesn't mean action so much, it means tension and all that kind of stuff. It's going to be the cranked up version of our show.
.... and Volume 3 was supossed to be called "Exodus" and Volume 4 "Villains"... interesting...
I want a healthy balance between the two, as long as the drama is actually decent drama...
Less Company will probably be a good move, I think. I'm tired of the mostly empty complexes passing for Company secret bases. And does Bob really do everything himself? Sheesh.
I'm hoping that, since Sylar is still around, he'll redeem himself as the villainous bastard we know he is.
When I first learned about this show, I thought it would be like X-men. That's why I like it so much. I agree that there shouldn't be a fight in every show, but why call the show Heroes if there's a fight only in the season finale? i think the show would be better if it didn't try to tell everyone's story, instead of just the cheerleader, Peter, Hiro, Sylar, Parkman, and Mohinder
I really liked the feel for season one and the first half of season 2 allot better.
It just came across are very realistic in how everything would actually go down in this scenario and it seemed to be exceptionally well planed and thought out. IMO
I want more drama like in season 1 and maybe alittle more action but it doesn't require a whole lot. To much will change the nature of the show entirely for me anyway. But I wouldn't mind to see just a tap more fighting.
Anyway I think the title is kind of a pun in itself. To me the show isn't about comic book heroes but more real people with comic book hero powers. Hence the "Heroes" pun. Also IMO!
Originally posted by Blue_Hefner
When I first learned about this show, I thought it would be like X-men. That's why I like it so much. I agree that there shouldn't be a fight in every show, but why call the show Heroes if there's a fight only in the season finale? i think the show would be better if it didn't try to tell everyone's story, instead of just the cheerleader, Peter, Hiro, Sylar, Parkman, and Mohinder
In a way i agree, instaed of 3 episodes of maya and alexandro running from place to place...it should have been done quick,then the action we did have would have been at a better pace
I dont believe there can ever be to much action, but the story comes first
Example......season one ending..dont tell me there should not have been more action..the climax was bad....but with our love of the characters we still get hooked by peter and nathans sacrafice
I tend to agree with both notions, but lean towards more action, without the sacrafice of a good story