Nine child rapists go free in Australia.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
7 yeah, 8, maybe, BUT 9!?

At least it's not 10. That would be bad.

Ah, there's worse things then rape.

Like being dead. You can't getover being dead.

You just haven't seen "Pushing Daisies" yet.

Anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

Originally posted by inimalist
right

reporting people for no good reason is sad

I'm glad you have since gotten solidly onto the trolly

lets never have it happen again 😉

Woah, what a ****ing stupid conclusion you just turned conducted. 😐

I didn't report him for "no reason". I'm reporting him because he's purposely being antagonising from another thread which he abandoned because he was too cowardly to admit he was wrong. However, feel free to make up some bullshit to cover up your tracks, I'm sure you won't look stupid.

Originally posted by tabby999
That has nothing to do with the fact that other people have come forward and complained about that judge in particular. There have been several more cases brought forward regarding this judge in the last couple days too.
And while the prosecutor may have a say in what the charges are, the judge still could have sent at least 3 of the men (26 is NOT a youth) to prison for what they did, but they were given suspended sentences and community service. Thats not the prosecutors fault, thats the judge, who decides what punishment is fitting to the crime.

I did say it doesn't completely excuse her. But lots of people have complained about the judge in ignorance that the main fault is that of the prosecution- if they had aimed to put the people in jail, they would have gone to jail. It IS the prosecutor's fault, in that the suspended sentence is what he was going for.

It is telling that it was the prosecutor that was suspended immediately, not the judge. And no-one is defending his conduct either- unlike the judge, who is actually getting some very robust support:

http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/rape-case-attacks-blasted/2007/12/12/1197135547552.html

You must not underestimate the strength of the prosecutor in all this. A court can only decide upon the case presented. If he deliberately presented a mild case, it's not the job of a judge to assume the case was actually different to that. It's simply the job of the judge to oversee the proceedings and, if found guilty, to sentence according to the information the Court heard.

If the Court heard from the Prosecutor that the rape was generally 'consensual' and that none of the accused ought to go to jail- as indeed was so- then as I say, it;s very difficult for a judge to go beyond that.

Originally posted by Sanctuary
http://www.guardian.co.uk/australia/story/0,,2225242,00.html

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22902781-601,00.html

That is way Islam has capital punishment putting them bastards in jail does nothing.

Originally posted by muslimscholar
That is way Islam has capital punishment putting them bastards in jail does nothing.

Originally posted by muslimscholar
That is way Islam has capital punishment putting them bastards in jail does nothing.

Aren't you promised virgins in heaven, if you live a proper Islamic life? Is the age of said virgins specified?

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Aren't you promised virgins in heaven, if you live a proper Islamic life? Is the age of said virgins specified?

nope

that is a very particular interpretation for virgin martyrs

basically, if you are going to kill yourself for the religion, you "mary" it, and as a reward, you get virgins.

I don't think its specified, but really, I don't think the virgins are a major part of islamic theology, more of a motivator for young, horney and oppressed boys to blow them selves up to get some action.

Originally posted by BackFire

Oh, also shows why women shouldn't be judges, they are unable to make good decisions.

Co-signed... even if she is Australian, it's still no excuse for this blantant stupidity.

Originally posted by inimalist
nope

that is a very particular interpretation for virgin martyrs

basically, if you are going to kill yourself for the religion, you "mary" it, and as a reward, you get virgins.

I don't think its specified, but really, I don't think the virgins are a major part of islamic theology, more of a motivator for young, horney and oppressed boys to blow them selves up to get some action.

Fair enough, though it wasn't really that much of a serious comment.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Fair enough, though it wasn't really that much of a serious comment.

i know

but god I love to nit pick

😛

Originally posted by muslimscholar
That is way Islam has capital punishment putting them bastards in jail does nothing.

While I agree that child-rapist should be killed, don't (some) Islamic countries allow grown men to marryvery young girls?

Originally posted by Robtard
While I agree that child-rapist should be killed, don't (some) Islamic countries allow grown men to marryvery young girls?

Yes, as young as 10.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Yeah, sure wish that had been around when Mohammend ****ed that kid.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen Aren't you promised virgins in heaven, if you live a proper Islamic life? Is the age of said virgins specified?

055.056
In them will be (Maidens), chaste, restraining their glances, whom no man or Jinn before them has touched;-

Originally posted by inimalist
nope

that is a very particular interpretation for virgin martyrs

basically, if you are going to kill yourself for the religion, you "mary" it, and as a reward, you get virgins.

I don't think its specified, but really, I don't think the virgins are a major part of islamic theology, more of a motivator for young, horney and oppressed boys to blow them selves up to get some action.

no that aint true.

Originally posted by Robtard
While I agree that child-rapist should be killed, don't (some) Islamic countries allow grown men to marryvery young girls?

You can only marry if you are past the age of puberty.

Originally posted by muslimscholar
055.056
In them will be (Maidens), chaste, restraining their glances, whom no man or Jinn before them has touched;-

You can only marry if you are past the age of puberty.

So what about thirteen years old?

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
So what about thirteen years old?

If she is past the age of puberty then yes

Originally posted by muslimscholar
If she is past the age of puberty then yes

Oh right, pretty sick and scummy.

Originally posted by muslimscholar

You can only marry if you are past the age of puberty.

Some girls reach puberty as young as 10, though it's rare. On avergae though, it's around 13.

Seems like in Islam, they add the label of "marriage" to make child-molestation not a horrible act; and that's twice as disgusting.

In reality though, the only real difference is, 'you' can molest little girls, if her father gives you permission to do so. Sick Islamic bastards.

Originally posted by Robtard
Some girls reach puberty as young as 10, though it's rare. On avergae though, it's around 13.

Seems like in Islam, they add the label of "marriage" to make child-molestation not a horrible act; and that's twice as disgusting.

In reality though, the only real difference is, 'you' can molest little girls, if her father gives you permission to do so. Sick Islamic bastards.

marriage to girls of these ages rarely happens the prophet did this because he wanted to teach her everything so when he died the women could come and ask her.