The 300 vs The Fellowship of the Ring Movie versions

Started by Kutulu3 pages
Originally posted by Inhuman
He has the reality gem

😆

Originally posted by Kutulu
Gotta love KMC sometimes. When all else fails, the character simply magically has an infinite supply of arrows and performs a hundred times better than he did in the story or the movie, and of course the LOTR fangirls flock to defend.

400+ arrows KMC style:

Great argument. So based off of that logic, Legolas managed to shoot hundreds of people using . . . 3 arrows.

Yeah, that makes total sense.

Originally posted by Kutulu
So let me get this straight - Legolas, by himself, will use his magical stack of 400 arrows that he gets "outta nowhere", to kill the Spartans, shooting through the phalanx shield wall which overlaps and doesn't have holes, killing 4 at a time. 😆

Thanks, I needed a good chuckle before going to sleep.

Umm.....yeah, actually. He will. It's well known in fiction that Elves are stupidly uber archers. But even by those standards, movie Legolas was broken as hell. The guy seemed to have an infinite ammo and pre-cog cheat code. HE NEVER TOOK A SINGLE SCRATCH IN ALL 3 MOVIES! 🤨

And FYI, I'm almost certain those arrows are armor piercing. And even if he runs out, he's got twin blades. And Gimli carries throwing axes.......

Even if Legolas runs out of arrows, he'll take out at least 50 or so bare min. That leaves 250 spartans vs. Aragorn, the king of gondor, Boromir, who took several poisoned Uruk-Hai arrows to bring down, Gimli, who's more than a match for 10 of them at a time, and Legolas, who is nigh unhittable.

Not to mention Anduril can probably cut through their shields like butter. The sword was not only elvish-made, it created mystic fire.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Great argument. So based off of that logic, Legolas managed to shoot hundreds of people using . . . 3 arrows.

Yeah, that makes total sense.

But him generating arrows using his infinite bag of arrows is more logical? hmm

Originally posted by Kutulu
Ahh I was wondering when my personal troll would show up. happywank
I made a point. It wasn't even an insult...

Me, be someone's personal troll? 😂

Originally posted by SaintSmurph
I made a point. It wasn't even an insult...

Me, be someone's personal troll? 😂

Yeah you've trolled me the past few days, kinda like a dingleberry that won't go away no matter how many times you wipe. It's a shameful position indeed, but I'm honored.

Originally posted by Kutulu
Yeah you've trolled me the past few days, kinda like a dingleberry that won't go away no matter how many times you wipe. It's a shameful position indeed, but I'm honored.
Don't flatter yourself. I guarantee if I've said something rude about you in the past few days, it's because you've said some exceptionally dumb things, and I happened to read them.

I wouldn't bother to follow you around.

And, if all these "trollings" are like me pointing out that Legolas never ran out of arrows despite shooting as fast, accurately and consistently as humanly (or elfishly) possible, then you're confusing "debating" and "trolling".

It's ok though. I promise I'll try not to hurt your feelings with them painful argument in the future.

petpet

Originally posted by Kutulu
But him generating arrows using his infinite bag of arrows is more logical? hmm

A phalanx being completely protective against arrows is logical? An Elf even existing is logical?

I love how people try to apply logic to things are completely illogical in the first place.

YAY! BLAX IS HERE!

Legolas soloes.

Legolis was not the only one with arrows Boromir and Aragorn had them to.