What if Sid never went nuclear...

Started by queeq9 pages

Just.... ya know.... ruling... signing decrees... nothing special, polishing up the special Honorary Sith Award for everyone to admire.

Originally posted by queeq
Just.... ya know.... ruling... signing decrees... nothing special, polishing up the special Honorary Sith Award for everyone to admire.

lol pretty much

Sure... some villain.

Originally posted by queeq
Sure... some villain.

although his-hands off millitary policy did save his life

Had he been on the 1st deathstar and not sitting on a chair somewhere else when luke blew it up he might have died.

vader being hands on and getting into a tie bomber saved his life.

Yyyyyyeah...

Originally posted by Man of Christ
although his-hands off millitary policy did save his life

Had he been on the 1st deathstar and not sitting on a chair somewhere else when luke blew it up he might have died.

vader being hands on and getting into a tie bomber saved his life.

What are you on about?

Originally posted by queeq
Yyyyyyeah...

wonderful retort. you are so smart...........

Thanks.

Well, you statements about the inactive politician make no sense anyway. So a smart answer is not really in place.

Originally posted by queeq
Thanks.

Well, you statements about the inactive politician make no sense anyway. So a smart answer is not really in place.

you must never have debated before qeeq. you never explain why you make your statement. you never give it any merit.

Originally posted by Man of Christ
Yes Palpatine would have no way of knowing about or preventing the death stars destruction. remember palpatine is only a politician, vader is the military leader thus palp would be dead too. either from the death stars destruction or a force strangle from an enraged vader

A debate is at least about arguments that can be supported by evidence. You make statements here that are contradictory to statements made by the characters and causal relations that make no sense:

1. You claim Palpy had no ability to see the future - that is WRONG, it wasn't perfect but he could forsee events. He said so and Yoda supported taht by saying that :through the Force things you will see, the future, the past". There's no reason to believe Palpy couldn't do taht either.
2. Palpy was noy JUST a politician. He was a ruling Sith dictator with supernatural powers
3. Just because Vader would die, wouldn't mean by his death alone that Palpy would die too. Had Vader lived longer, he would have survived the DS just like Luke did
4. You assume that Vader would be stronger than Palpy killing him with a Force choke, yet Vader said himself to Luke that he didn't understand the power of the Dark Side. That suggests Palpy had a hold over Vader that superceded Anakin's powers.

Enough debate? Then again, anyone who watches these movies already concluded your statement didn't make any sense.

Wow...was that really needed?

Originally posted by queeq
A debate is at least about arguments that can be supported by evidence. You make statements here that are contradictory to statements made by the characters and causal relations that make no sense:

1. You claim Palpy had no ability to see the future - that is WRONG, it wasn't perfect but he could forsee events. He said so and Yoda supported taht by saying that :through the Force things you will see, the future, the past". There's no reason to believe Palpy couldn't do taht either.
2. Palpy was noy JUST a politician. He was a ruling Sith dictator with supernatural powers
3. Just because Vader would die, wouldn't mean by his death alone that Palpy would die too. Had Vader lived longer, he would have survived the DS just like Luke did
4. You assume that Vader would be stronger than Palpy killing him with a Force choke, yet Vader said himself to Luke that he didn't understand the power of the Dark Side. That suggests Palpy had a hold over Vader that superceded Anakin's powers.

Enough debate? Then again, anyone who watches these movies already concluded your statement didn't make any sense.

lmao.. are you high?

siddious isnt omnicient. im sure your great sith leader foresaw the destruction of the deathstar when he wad talkin all that trash to luke saying that the rebellion would be crushed. but guess what..

bottom line. he said he was going to live but ended up dying

WHAT?!?!?!

If he foresaw the destruction of the death star...why would he be there?! Sith want to live forever...getting as powerful as they possibly can...but no...not Sidious apparently...he want to chill out on the DS so he can blow up.

Originally posted by Man of Christ
siddious isnt omnicient.

I never said that he was. Sidious winning the Battle of Endor was no doubt a possible outcome. "Always in motion the future is."

It should have been the outcome...

Re: What if Sid never went nuclear...

Originally posted by K-Dog
It obviously never happened, but what would have happened if Sid finished frying Luke? Would vader have had to pick up the body and throw it down the shaft? Would Sid have allowed Vader to remain a sith, after he just got beaten down by a jedi? If not, would Sid fry Vader? If so, would he try to go get princess leia for a apprentice? If not, who else?

I think you're looking way too seriously into an 80's sci-fi movie that has a guy shooting electricty out of his fingers.

Re: Re: What if Sid never went nuclear...

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
I think you're looking way too seriously into an 80's sci-fi movie that has a guy shooting electricty out of his fingers.
thats the purpose of this section.

Indeed.

What else would it be for?

Indeed.