Galactus vs Tyrant, Thanos, and PC Darkseid

Started by nvrbeenwthagirl6 pages
Originally posted by Mr. Slippyfist
With characters from the Electric Company in the comics...

And your point? There have been comics with howard the duck, star trek beings, real life people such as kirby and Mike carlin. Doesn't make them non canon.

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
And your point? There have been comics with howard the duck, star trek beings, real life people such as kirby and Mike carlin. Doesn't make them non canon.
Howard the Duck = Marvel
Star Trek beings = non canon
Real life people means nothing... as they are the writers

Really, I don't see your point. 😬

Unless a crossover, or crossover series is said why it's canon to Marvel/DC/whatever, then it's non-canon. Simple.

Originally posted by Mr. Slippyfist
Howard the Duck = Marvel
Star Trek beings = non canon
Real life people means nothing... as they are the writers

Really, I don't see your point. 😬

Unless a crossover, or crossover series is said why it's canon to Marvel/DC/whatever, then it's non-canon. Simple.

IT wasn't a cross over. The electric company is NOt a comic company and license thier characters to anyone they choose. Period.

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
IT wasn't a cross over. The electric company is NOt a comic company and license thier characters to anyone they choose. Period.
And neither is Star Trek...
However, Electric Company does have comic characters... that are in the stories. Plus, they are also a book for kids 5-7 years old.

Also, no story to my knowledge, or anything has ever said that the series is canon. 🙂
If you can find one, then, and only then, will I believe you. Otherwise, it's just another crossover. 😬

Also, Spidey Super Stories is based off of a live action skit (s).

The hostess comics were funny

Originally posted by Inhuman
The hostess comics were funny
Those were grand.

Originally posted by Mr. Slippyfist
And neither is Star Trek...
However, Electric Company does have comic characters... that are in the stories. Plus, they are also a book for kids 5-7 years old.

Also, no story to my knowledge, or anything has ever said that the series is canon. 🙂
If you can find one, then, and only then, will I believe you. Otherwise, it's just another crossover. 😬

Also, Spidey Super Stories is based off of a live action skit (s).

So a story has to be mentioned else where to be canon? I don't remember the Donna troy one shot mentioned anywhere else.

Originally posted by Mr. Slippyfist
Those were grand.

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
So a story has to be mentioned else where to be canon? I don't remember the Donna troy one shot mentioned anywhere else.
Except Spidey Super Stories is not only for ages 6-10... it is essentially a big crossover series... and it's based off a live action show...

Now, your proof of it being canon, please?

Originally posted by Mr. Slippyfist
[b]Except Spidey Super Stories is not only for ages 6-10... it is essentially a big crossover series... and it's based off a live action show...

Now, your proof of it being canon, please? [/B]

It's canon unless other wise proven that it is not> it's not the other way around. YOu prove that it's not. All you give is speculatory judgement at best. And while I see your point, unless it's proven IT Wasn't canon, then it is. And for the record, all comics were for kids when they first came out. they got more advanced as the audience aged.

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
It's canon unless other wise proven that it is not> it's not the other way around. YOu prove that it's not. All you give is speculatory judgement at best. And while I see your point, unless it's proven IT Wasn't canon, then it is. And for the record, all comics were for kids when they first came out. they got more advanced as the audience aged.
All crossovers are non-canon unless they are proven it's not.
And, being based off a live action show is essentially = to being based off a cartoon.
Ages 6-10 also would mean it doesn't apply to anyone higher to that... and means that not everyone is meant to read it. Are you older than 10?

Again... proof please?

EDIT: Is that why comics were in Newspapers?

Originally posted by Mr. Slippyfist
All crossovers are non-canon unless they are proven it's not.
And, being based off a live action show is essentially = to being based off a cartoon.
Ages 6-10 also would mean it doesn't apply to anyone higher to that... and means that not everyone is meant to read it. Are you older than 10?

Again... proof please?

EDIT: Is that why comics were in Newspapers?

YOu obviously haven't done your homework on comics. IT's a well known fact that reader ship of comics has aged, and that the readers of yester year are the readers of today. Which is why some silly feats in silver age and PC age dont' go over well. Now as for the book being a cross over, It isn't. Pulling characters from another show does not denote it being a cross over. Unless BOTH companies publish said comic. It's published SOLELY by marvel.

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
YOu obviously haven't done your homework on comics. IT's a well known fact that reader ship of comics has aged, and that the readers of yester year are the readers of today. Which is why some silly feats in silver age and PC age dont' go over well. Now as for the book being a cross over, It isn't. Pulling characters from another show does not denote it being a cross over. Unless BOTH companies publish said comic. It's published SOLELY by marvel.

So in "yesteryear" no one over the age of 10 or so read comics? 😬

Originally posted by Inhuman
So in "yesteryear" no one over the age of 10 or so read comics? 😬

IF that is what you got out of that then you should take comprehension. We are talking about what was INTENDED. Who the comics where aimed at. As was the original point of Bran who said that the comic was aimed at readers 6-10. Obviously people older read it as well.

Crossovers are non-canon... Unless both companies acknowledge them as being canon they are not. Which means that the only canon crossover is JLAvengers. Electric company and Marvel never confirmed it as being canon.

And btw, even if it WAS canon it wouldn't be allowed since it's blatent PIS.

Originally posted by King Kandy
Crossovers are non-canon... Unless both companies acknowledge them as being canon they are not. Which means that the only canon crossover is JLAvengers. Electric company and Marvel never confirmed it as being canon.

And btw, even if it WAS canon it wouldn't be allowed since it's blatent PIS.

Except the electric company didn't publish said cross over. So they have no rights to it at all. marvel owns the property wholey. Once the electric comany lic. out thier characters, they gave marvel free reign. Thus the book isn't a cross over. And The book may be PIS, but it's canon. It's PIS that DS ever got beaten by Superman that one time, but hey, it's canon.

Originally posted by King Kandy
And btw, even if it WAS canon it wouldn't be allowed since it's blatent PIS.
And Batman making DS bleed isn't?

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
Except the electric company didn't publish said cross over. So they have no rights to it at all. marvel owns the property wholey. Once the electric comany lic. out thier characters, they gave marvel free reign. Thus the book isn't a cross over. And The book may be PIS, but it's canon. It's PIS that DS ever got beaten by Superman that one time, but hey, it's canon.

So if Marvel publishes a comic staring Superman, it isn't a crossover? As long as DC doesn't publish one of their own?

I don't buy that for a second. It's a crossover if it uses characters from two different companies. IE DC/Marvel or Marvel/Electric Company.

Also the reason DS's low showings aren't considered PIS is because they happen on a regular basis. on the other hand you only have ONE superl low showing for Thanos. One isn't enough, it's PIS.

Originally posted by Violent2Dope
And Batman making DS bleed isn't?

Well DS has shit like that happen to him on a regular basis. Thanos doesn't.

Originally posted by King Kandy
So if Marvel publishes a comic staring Superman, it isn't a crossover? As long as DC doesn't publish one of their own?

I don't buy that for a second. It's a crossover if it uses characters from two different companies. IE DC/Marvel or Marvel/Electric Company.

Also the reason DS's low showings aren't considered PIS is because they happen on a regular basis. on the other hand you only have ONE superl low showing for Thanos. One isn't enough, it's PIS.

IT would be dumb as **** not to consider Batman making DS bleed as PIS. Period. DS only has one low showing against Superman. As for Batman making DS bleed, I guess you missed the staff blasting DS first? Or Batman having some wierd New God tech allowing him to actually touch the staff of highfather. Also, The electric company is NOT a comic book company. They are free to lease out thier chracters to whom they please. If Superman is leased to marvel, It wouldn't be a cross over if Superman was goign to be in marvel. ANd that was actually planned after all access. for the companies to swap characters and have it be canon.