Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I'm not talking about me; I'm talking about you. You have things in your life that you believe are true, but you cannot prove them. That is called faith. You believe in science, but science at it's very core is based on faith that the laws of nature that exist here are the same all over the universe. We cannot know that to be true, but we have faith that it is true. How is that faith any better then the faith in a god? You can criticize people for not being logical or believing things that have been proved to be untrue, but to put someone down because they have faith is hypocritical.
Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Why are you both multiply posting the same thing again and again. It's just.. stupid.
because that is what trans has been doing, brushing aside evidence and claiming a hollow personal victory. im not gonna write the arguments again so ill continue to repost them until the time he actually addresses them, he has dodged them for now.
Originally posted by chickenlover98
thats funny because i never stated that the laws that apply here are present in the entire universe. that is an assumption. i believe there are things we cant even imagine out there, that aint faith thats fact. there is life in the universe besides us,we just cant detect them. that isnt faith. faith is believing in something without proof. my proof for that is bacteria on the moon and on mars. you lose
Faith is not believing in something without proof. That is blind faith. Faith is believing in something that cannot be proved or disproved. That does not mean that there is no evidence.
BTW there is no bacteria on the Moon and on Mars as far as we know.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Faith is not believing in something without proof. That is blind faith. Faith is believing in something that cannot be proved or disproved. That does not mean that there is no evidence.BTW there is no bacteria on the Moon and on Mars as far as we know.
wrong:http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/newsroom/pressreleases/20020802a.html.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/277674.stm.
if something cant be proven it isnt worth believing in. that doesnt really apply to a scientific theory, because theres circumstantial evidence and indirect causes which lead to a theory which cant be proven. the idea of "god" is really brought up because of human inadequacy and fear
Originally posted by chickenlover98
wrong:http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/newsroom/pressreleases/20020802a.html.http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/277674.stm.
if something cant be proven it isnt worth believing in. that doesnt really apply to a scientific theory, because theres circumstantial evidence and indirect causes which lead to a theory which cant be proven. the idea of "god" is really brought up because of human inadequacy and fear
Originally posted by chickenlover98
wrong:http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/newsroom/pressreleases/20020802a.html.http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/277674.stm.
if something cant be proven it isnt worth believing in. that doesnt really apply to a scientific theory, because theres circumstantial evidence and indirect causes which lead to a theory which cant be proven. the idea of "god" is really brought up because of human inadequacy and fear
That is your belief that you have faith in. I was never talking about a belief in god or gods; I was talking about faith. You have faith, so don't go around criticising others for having faith.
Originally posted by Shakyamunisoni have no faith . i dont believe in something that cant be prove. cept the flying spaghetti monster but he controls the weather 😉
That is your belief that you have faith in. I was never talking about a belief in god or gods; I was talking about faith. You have faith, so don't go around criticising others for having faith.
Concerning geocentric theory, I think it should be pointed out that This Thing HERE completely disproves it.
Originally posted by chickenlover98
funny thing, science is fact and based off of logical observation
Not true. We cannot see an electron. We know what it does, but we cannot prove that it is real. We are only now beginning to understand that it might not be real. You have faith that is real, and it is that faith that makes it real to you.
Originally posted by Shakyamunisonultra fail. its called a scanning tunneling microscope. try again. ah marine biology class thou have tought me well 😉
Not true. We cannot see an electron. We know what it does, but we cannot prove that it is real. We are only now beginning to understand that it might not be real. You have faith that is real, and it is that faith that makes it real to you.
Originally posted by chickenlover98
ultra fail. its called a scanning tunneling microscope. try again. ah marine biology class thou have tought me well 😉
😆 A scanning tunneling microscope uses electrons to see atoms. You cannot see electrons with a scanning tunneling microscope. My point is that there are things in your life that you have faith in.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
😆 A scanning tunneling microscope uses electrons to see atoms. You cannot see electrons with a scanning tunneling microscope. My point is that there are things in your life that you have faith in.
like i said, if its observable or you can use circumstantial evidence to prove it exists, guess what, it exists. you just proved my point by saying it USES electrons 😆 😆 😆
Originally posted by chickenlover98
like i said, if its observable or you can use circumstantial evidence to prove it exists, guess what, it exists. you just proved my point by saying it USES electrons 😆 😆 😆
I said it uses electron because I have faith that electrons exist just like most everyone. I have faith in a lot of things in life. It is you that has a problem with faith, not me.
Originally posted by Shakyamunisonapparently you dont understand faith. cannot be proved by any means. electrons can, and thats by testing things around it. we know they are because we can harness them. just like a black hole, we cant SEE them, because theres no light, but we know they are there. the problem with your point here is, you still havent brought up something that cant be say........mathematically proven
I said it uses electron because I have faith that electrons exist just like most everyone. I have faith in a lot of things in life. It is you that has a problem with faith, not me.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
😆 A scanning tunneling microscope uses electrons to see atoms. You cannot see electrons with a scanning tunneling microscope. My point is that there are things in your life that you have faith in.
When it comes down to it, everything someone thinks to know is just having faith.
Originally posted by chickenlover98
apparently you dont understand faith. cannot be proved by any means. electrons can, and thats by testing things around it. we know they are because we can harness them. just like a black hole, we cant SEE them, because theres no light, but we know they are there. the problem with your point here is, you still havent brought up something that cant be say........mathematically proven
... and you have demonstrated great faith.