Video Blog: The Case for Christ
The Case for Christ
w/ Lee Strobel
YouTube video
YouTube video
YouTube video
YouTube video
YouTube video
YouTube video
YouTube video
YouTube video
Video Blog: The Case for Christ
The Case for Christ
w/ Lee Strobel
YouTube video
YouTube video
YouTube video
YouTube video
YouTube video
YouTube video
YouTube video
YouTube video
Well, to add some reasoning to chicken's statement, it's not a bad suggestion. Your two recent threads are nearly identical. And they could also go into threads that already exist, rather than making new threads for some copy/pasted youtube clips.
It's the same with recent threads about ID. We have multiple threads dedicated to it already, yet ushome has made at least 2 in recent weeks that I can think of that are nothing but veiled attempts to re-package pre-existing topics in order to push his agenda.
Debate where you will about whatever you want, but your thread habits are becoming ridiculous. It's becoming spam, and is notcably detracting from the diversity of the forum's threads.
Originally posted by DigiMark007
Well, to add some reasoning to chicken's statement, it's not a bad suggestion. Your two recent threads are nearly identical. And they could also go into threads that already exist, rather than making new threads for some copy/pasted youtube clips.It's the same with recent threads about ID. We have multiple threads dedicated to it already, yet ushome has made at least 2 in recent weeks that I can think of that are nothing but veiled attempts to re-package pre-existing topics in order to push his agenda.
Debate where you will about whatever you want, but your thread habits are becoming ridiculous. It's becoming spam, and is notcably detracting from the diversity of the forum's threads.
let me again restate you sir, are the best forum poster 👆
And not one of you watched the video blog. How do I know this--just as I know many have not watched "The Case for a Creator?--because I watched them myself; and after doing so, I refreshed the page to find posts already on the threads. You can disagree all you want; I have no problem with that. But when people make statements about something they know nothing about is frustrating. It's not fair, and all I ask is for people to be reasonable. I'm not here to push an agenda. Watch the videos and take from them what you want. If anyone watched the videos, it would be clear that "objectivity" is the motivating factor behind them, not fallacious lies and propaganda. The videos are presented to create your own opinions.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Maybe we should get onto YouTube and post some things that counter the opening clips... but that would mean we would have to watch them... oh! never mind.😆
lol. im kinda gettin sick of ushomefree now. he' just postin shit.
hey shaky wanna pool together to get a big black guy named bubba to beat him up?
Originally posted by ushomefree
And not one of you watched the video blog. How do I know this--just as I know many have not watched "The Case for a Creator?--because I watched them myself; and after doing so, I refreshed the page to find posts already on the threads. You can disagree all you want; I have no problem with that. But when people make statements about something they know nothing about is frustrating. It's not fair, and all I ask is for people to be reasonable. I'm not here to push an agenda. Watch the videos and take from them what you want. If anyone watched the videos, it would be clear that "objectivity" is the motivating factor behind them, not fallacious lies and propaganda. The videos are presented to create your own opinions.
propaganda? practically every vid u post is christian propaganda. get your own damn evidence, and make it ****ing readable for once
I am of the personal opinion that, when you post a thread, the start of the thread should not just be a bunch of videos that you think everyone should watch. You should be voicing your own opinions and reflections on the videos that you are presenting.
I close Conspiracy Forum threads for simply starting with a video.
Chicken, please keep the language and content under control, please. We don't support bashing, no matter what the cause of it is.
Originally posted by Captain REX
I am of the personal opinion that, when you post a thread, the start of the thread should not just be a bunch of videos that you think everyone should watch. You should be voicing your own opinions and reflections on the videos that you are presenting.I close Conspiracy Forum threads for simply starting with a video.
Chicken, please keep the language and content under control, please. We don't support bashing, no matter what the cause of it is.
good for you rex. this isnt a conspiracy thread, its thinly veiled douche baggery. 🙁
he starts multiple rediculus threads and expects people to read them.
i dont care that he starts with a vid, but 7 or 8 is way too much. how bout u tell him to stop makinj bullcrap stead of ALWAYS picking on me?
Originally posted by ushomefree
And not one of you watched the video blog. How do I know this--just as I know many have not watched "The Case for a Creator?--because I watched them myself; and after doing so, I refreshed the page to find posts already on the threads. You can disagree all you want; I have no problem with that. But when people make statements about something they know nothing about is frustrating. It's not fair, and all I ask is for people to be reasonable. I'm not here to push an agenda. Watch the videos and take from them what you want. If anyone watched the videos, it would be clear that "objectivity" is the motivating factor behind them, not fallacious lies and propaganda. The videos are presented to create your own opinions.
Missing the point entirely. You're trying to push your agenda onto others. Actually talk with people, and discuss them in the right places without creating worthless threads that all cover the same topic. Then maybe you'll get actual responses, or at least something more than the apathy that you routinely receive as a result of your tendencies on the forums.
Nobody is interested in your copy/paste messages because you come across as personally abrasive and impersonal. At this point, your debating tactics, if they can be called that, are reaching levels of JIA. You just manage to pull from alternative sources other than the Bible, but it's the same idea.