Originally posted by DigiMark007
Has ushome ever actually conceded something once someone like Xmarks or inamilist shows him evidence/proof/logic/etc?? He never did with me when I used to bother with lengthy rebuttals, but I don't really pay enough attention to the ever-escalating ID/Evolution war on the forums, so maybe he has at some point.
Originally posted by Quark_666
Does it count if he says, "that is exactly my point"?
Originally posted by queeq
Everything counts.
What I meant was, you can't make a point against someone who believes that every point fits into his own argument perfectly. THAT doesn't count.
Originally posted by inimalist
actually, I can list you things that would make me skeptical of pretty much anything I believe. There are very specific incidences of evidence, which I can describe for you, that would convince me that I am wrong.[b]THAT
is the beauty of science. [/B]
That's what makes peer review so interesting I assume...
Originally posted by Quark_666
Noone said barbarism was bad, and plenty don't think peer review is good.
I said barbarism was bad
plenty = barbarians
lol
really, who has beef with peer review? I mean, some people probably don't like that it cuts up their work or ideas, but like, as a concept, its pretty bad ass