Cloverfield 2

Originally posted by GGS
How does it attack the bridge while it's in the city centre then and magically reappear hardly moved from the city centre when the army attack it. How does it's mass and facial features change dramatically during the night until Hud is eaten? Different camera angles? lol that hardly cuts as an excuse when one of the film's whole selling point is it's shot on one camcorder so that's that theory debunked.

There was damage on the monster that was bombed you can see it in the helicopter yet the one that comes up and eats hud is like totally unhurt and they wake up from helicopter crash is only 40 mins after it does crash. Hardly looks like the monster that ate hud has been fighting military all night.

The prequel book information is hinting at a mother and son duo as well.

Go watch it again and open up to the possibility if you look at the evidence. I'm totally prepared to admit i'm wrong but nothing is final with JJ Abrams lol every Lost watcher knows that!, The clues are defintely there but we'll all have to wait and see.

You cant really tell how damaged the monster is infront of Hud. Its shadow is too strong soo its still hard to get into any REAL detail. I saw no damage on it when it attacked the chopper either. Even if there is, you have absolutely no clue about what kind of healing capabilities the monster may have. I'm not saying there isnt two, because the whole bridge attack thing threw me off as well. But I dont think the movie intended for people to believe there were two monsters.

I would go and watch a sequel, I just hope it Abrams doesn't throw away what he has going for him with this.

Obviously there will be a sequel, but I just feel like that needs to be it. What could possibly be the point though? Different viewpoint, ok, quite a nice, innovative idea. What will the story gain, though? Will these people have found out more? Will they have seen more of the monster?

Maybe some of them filmed the destruction of Central Park and we get to see if there really was anyone surviving.

No clue, absolutely no clue. I just hope it doesn't become a regular monster movie. I do find it a bit hypocritical of Abrams, though. His original premise was to have an insane, new monster, and he's created a brilliant one in my opinion. However, he critiqued King Kong and Godzilla as being charming and adorable, but that's because there's a million action figures and kids toys out. So what does he do? He let's Hasbro release a 13 inch tall poseable figure of the monster, which sounds admittedly bad ass, but will undoubtedly ruin all mystery.

-AC

I would watch the sequel as well, but I can definetly see it being crap. How does one make a movie that's just as good, but with half the hype and mysteriousness? We already know what it looks like, as well as the little spider thingies. And we'll already knwo that as soon as someone get's bit, they're screwed.

I don't know.. they pulled it off in Aliens.

Because the hype isn't what made me enjoy this movie.

It made me curious, it caused me to see it, it didn't make the actual movie good, and your comment is somewhat telling about how people are judging this movie, and why.

Most people had already decided this movie would be "awesome" when they saw the teaser. I didn't, it could have been shit. I wasn't going in to see a monster either, really. In fact, it was the opposite. I was excited because I had hoped the movie wouldn't just be another monster movie, about a monster, and about killing it. It wasn't, and my opinion of it is nothing to do with the hype. Hence my much documented stance on people like Fist going on about it so much without seeing it.

I wasn't theorising over what it could be, or why. I heard the premise and I was genuinely interested in the approach and what they set out to achieve, I feel they did so and therefore I was massively satisfied.

I have a lot in it for me, people who saw it and enjoyed it because of pre-hype, do not. The filmmakers aren't even responsible for the hype, it's not like they did a Bill Gates and spent retarded amounts on marketing. It was one two minute teaser for the longest time, then a trailer and a poster. People got themselves carried away and have nobody but themselves to blame if they feel let down.

You've gotta realise how hard it is to do what Abrams did, in today's world. Hence why people need to chill the f*ck out and actually wait 'til these things are released, then find out for yourself.

-AC

I share the same sentiments as you do.

But most people do not, hence why I think making a sequel might be a mistake.

already? I heard its in post production lol. give me a break cloverf'ck.

What?

http://imdb.com/title/tt1179933/

Originally posted by GGS
How does it attack the bridge while it's in the city centre then and magically reappear hardly moved from the city centre when the army attack it.

Horror Plot device, how does Jason magically disappear and reappear right behind someone ? Horror plot device.

Originally posted by GGS
How does it's mass and facial features change dramatically during the night until Hud is eaten?

They don't, it's just the camera is at an angle and the lighting is incredibly poor.

Originally posted by GGS
Different camera angles? lol that hardly cuts as an excuse when one of the film's whole selling point is it's shot on one camcorder so that's that theory debunked.

Note the word 'CAMCORDER', their not exactly picture perfect, especially in the middle of the night aimed at a creature whose getting rapidly different lighting around it.

Originally posted by GGS
There was damage on the monster that was bombed you can see it in the helicopter yet the one that comes up and eats hud is like totally unhurt

It reacted in pain from the carpet bombing but their was little to no wounds upon its body. Also the parasites were absorbing a lot of the damage.

Originally posted by GGS
and they wake up from helicopter crash is only 40 mins after it does crash. Hardly looks like the monster that ate hud has been fighting military all night.

It's a giant monster,Logic doesn't have to be its strong point.

Originally posted by GGS
The prequel book information is hinting at a mother and son duo as well.

As in the manga ? Because that's a pile of shit. Instead of going with Abrams 'Under-sea trench , awoken by Slusho' the dumb ass is trying to say his OC created Cloverfield due to his mothers death or some bullshit like that...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloverfield_2#Sequel

No surprise

Yes no surprise. No surprise at all considering the Cloverfield Sequal Thread is only a few topics down from this one.

Originally posted by steverules
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloverfield_2#Sequel

No surprise

Cloverfield sucked!

NO U!

What a cloverfield sequel.,?

Originally posted by faithxp
What a cloverfield sequel.,?

What are you even trying to say? 😕

Originally posted by Dusty
Yeah. **** you. Find the right thread. Spell sequel.

F*ck you 😄 💃 😱

Originally posted by Vinny Valentine
[b]

It's coming, and you all know it.

Ideas on plot/story/ideas?

vincent

[/B]

The monster will probably be killed somehow in the sequal, thus ending cloverfield...I wonder if they'll find out where it came from

Originally posted by endrict
But the first BWP sucked...

No it didn't....it only sucked because people found out the real story AFTER the fact.

For weeks people speculated what had happen to the crew. If it wasn't for the early days of message boards and chat rooms the film would have build a stronger mystery.

Of course, if someone watch it without knowing what happen. I betcha a cherry coke that someone would be intrigued.