Originally posted by queeq
You say you don't misquote, I proof you misquote. That makes you a liar.
You say you never put words in my mouth: I never said the Bible is proof of divine intervention, you claim I did. That's putting words in my mouth.On both counts: what you say is contrary to the facts of your behaviour in this very thread. Ergo, you're a liar.
Don't get me wrong, I don't mind if you're a liar. But don't come demanding me to present you any personal data, like I have to answer to you. You act quite weird, but I didn't take you for some fascist police officer. A long time ago when you'd have asked me in a normal way, I'd have given you all the answers. But that's out of the question now.
I didn't misquote you. My point before that quote was that you are a supporter of biblical literality, and it still is. You're a liar based on your claim that you directed those videos, whch are presented from a biblical perspective. You are either lying about being the director, or you are lying about not answering the question I raised because you believe the bible to be the literal word of god. You don't have to answer to me, you have to answer to the words that come out of your mouth.
Again, are you not a christian? Are you not lying about being the director of the three documentaries you presented as evidence to substantiate your claims of expertise? (Especially since 2 of the 3 were directed by 2 different men, making you a blatant liar already)