Originally posted by quanchi112
It is superbowl week and if you dont like this you dont have to post. I said I was going to do this. I never understood posters who dont like the idea of a thread and then posting in it just to complain. Either give your opinion or just ignore the thread.
Why didn't you just make one thread that says. "What team from the past or present could be the Patriots and why?" instead of spamming a bunch of unnecessary threads?
Re: 1984 Cardinals vs. 1963 Chiefs vs. 2003 Broncos vs. 1944 Lions vs. 2007 Patriots
Originally posted by botankus
Who wins and why? Why????????? Damn it, why??????
Leave it to you to you to make light of the situation.
And be a dick hahahahah....
I was going to make a thread.
1992 Cowboys without Newton, Novacheck and Jason Garret vs 2007 Patriots without Kevin Faulk, Jabar Gaffney and Chris Hanson. The arena for battle has flamethrowers at the 30 yard line if the QB steps on the 35 yard line pressure plat and a spike trap in the middle of each endzone which the SS can hit the flag pole with only one foot.
Medics are turned off for this match.
Also, its the Patriots home field, so section 105, who bought the $20 beer have the ability to have heak seeking missles. Also, away team gets armour plating helmets only if they get a TD in the first minute of the game.
Originally posted by DigiMark007
Don't go conspiracy on us. If you win SB's in the NFL you get paid exorbitant amounts of money. Maybe if this was, I dunno lacrosse, you'd have a point. But no, he just threw some sh*tty passes. There's no money in playing badly in the NFL...even if the short-term gain is better, the long-term is painfully worse. Anyone can see that.And I'm a hardcore Steelers fan, so if there was a case to be made, I'd make it.
He could have been offered much more money by someone though for those 2 interceptions than he would have got for winning the superbowl.I will be the first to admit I got no proof of it.Nobody does.Its just my gut feeling deep down inside he did because like I said,O'donnel seems like that kind of person who would do that.Look who he signed with the next year.the new york jets,a team that had won only one game the previous year.The guy obviously did not care about winning games at that point in his life and only cared about money.On THIS one,I wont fault you for not agreeing with me since like i said,I dont have any proof to back it up on since its just my gut feeling the way O'donnel went to sign and play for the crappiest team in the league the next year instead of staying with a winning organization.
Re: 1994 49ers vs 2007 Patriots
Originally posted by quanchi112
Who wins and why?
Niners.because like someone said.Jerry Rice and also because they were destined to win it all to show that steve young was capable of replacing joe montana and winning a superbowl for them.a monkey he had to carry on his back and live with for the next couple of years after replacing him.
So finally, can we stop all this talk about how they are the best team to ever play the game.
And that Brady is the best QB to ever play the game. (Literally, read an article about it today)
I actually really want to read what Bill Simmons have to say about the game. Considering, he's a sportswriter and every second article is about a Boston team and literally the pick article he wrote was all ab out the Patriots and nothing to do with the Giants. I cant wait.
Hopefully, he doesnt blame it on bad officiating. (not saying there was, or wasnt)