King Kong vs Cloverfield

Like BH said already, different camera angles and positions can make the creature seem smaller or faster.

Originally posted by Darth Martin
Like BH said already, different camera angles and positions can make the creature seem smaller or faster.

In just melee matches with monsters with no energy or beam attacks, then Cloverkaiju would do very well, and against King Kong, he would beat him with ease. Cloverkaiju survived against everything the military threw at it, Kong would die if he was experienced to this kind of military assault.

mmm

Originally posted by Estacado
mmm

That picture is noncanon.

The parasites are maybe twice the size of a beagol dog. Cloverfield is approximatly 500 feet tall.

Originally posted by Blax_Hydralisk
The Cloverfield monster has survived:

The entire United States military literally going hail marry on it with tanks, jets, and infantry, as well as the equivalent of a Nuclear warhead.

King King has:

Died after getting shot a few times by airplanes that were made in the 50's.

Cloverfield no contest.

You are essentially right- Kong would lose to the MUCH larger monster in Cloverfield (tho there is no reason to believe the monster has ANY chance of surviving a nuke)... but Kong (the original and the P. Jackson remake were set in the mid 1930's- and the planes were World War I models- from 1915-1918. Just to correct your time lines.

PS- why is this thread here? Shouldn't this be in a movie forum?

I just assumed that it was at least close to being the equivelent as the military refers to it as "The mother of all bobms". But you're correct, as that is rather amiguous and there is no real proof that he could survive it.

And thanks for correcting the timelines.