15 year old boy slaughters his family

Started by Blax_Hydralisk8 pages
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
said what? I said the kid had deep seeded mental issues, I never said insane. You gotta elaborate, man.

it was a joke.

In the very post that you made saying yui never said it, you did, in fact, say it twice.

it was kinf of a short "haw haw I c wat u did thar", kinda thing.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
so if someone has any type of mental issues, they are therefore insane? no matter how minor the issue?

I asked you to elaborate on what you meant by mental issues, since when that phrase is USUALLY said, people USUALLY (True or not), mean "Insane.".

Why couldn't you just say what you meant? Why does everything have to be dodge 'em cars with you?

-AC

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I just posted there is no way for me to know that.

That's the exact point AC has been making, I believe.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I asked you to elaborate on what you meant by mental issues, since when that phrase is USUALLY said, people USUALLY (True or not), mean "Insane.".

Why couldn't you just say what you meant? Why does everything have to be dodge 'em cars with you?

-AC

I said "dude had deep seeded mental issues"....you are saying that I said "he is insane".....I clarified for you, numerous times, that I never said he was insane, that there is no way for me to know if he is insane, and now you are making a mountain out of a molehill about it.

theres no dodging, no evasion, no weaseling. I posted my opinion of the kid, you took it the wrong way, I clarified what I meant in plain english. Explain how I am dodging.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I asked you to elaborate on what you meant by mental issues, since when that phrase is USUALLY said, people USUALLY (True or not), mean "Insane.".

Why couldn't you just say what you meant? Why does everything have to be dodge 'em cars with you?

-AC

Really? I didn't think that that is what people meant when they said "deep seeded issues"...I always thought people meant "insane" when they said "insane" and really deep mental issues when they said "deep seeded mental" issues...like he was abused as a child or some psychological stuff like that.

It looks like you are trying to pin on him your interpretation of that phrase and he has made it quite clear that your interpretation is not his interpretation.

Like I said before, one can be sane but still do something that society deems as "not normal".

You were dodging, you aren't now.

So what do you mean by "mental issues"? Elaborate on your opinion of the kid.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Really? I didn't think that that is what people meant when they said "deep seeded issues"...I always thought people meant "insane" when they said "insane" and really deep mental issues when they said "deep seeded mental" issues...like he was abused as a child or some psychological stuff like that.

It looks like you are trying to pin on him your interpretation of that phrase and he has made it quite clear that your interpretation is not his interpretation.

Like I said before, one can be sane but still do something that society deems as "not normal".

He has NOW, he didn't before.

He has since cleared it up and there were crossed wires. Some people say the exact thing they mean, others don't, and then use the excuse "You should know what I meant.", as RJ has done in the past.

He has since cleared it up.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
You were dodging, you aren't now.

So what do you mean by "mental issues"? Elaborate on your opinion of the kid.

-AC

you need to point out where I dodged. quote me. show me where I dodged.

I already stated my opinion of the kid, he has deep seeded mental issues. Without having a degree in psychology and examining him, theres no way in hell I can make that call, theres no way I can tell how deep the issues run.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
you need to point out where I dodged. quote me. show me where I dodged.

I already stated my opinion of the kid, he has deep seeded mental issues. Without having a degree in psychology and examining him, theres no way in hell I can make that call, theres no way I can tell how deep the issues run.

You could have just answered my original question, you didn't. You dodged and just asked ME questions.

I said "Mental issues is generally (Correct or not) said as meaning insane. What do YOU mean?" and asked you to elaborate. You chose not to in your reply, just to ask me questions. This is all irrelevant now, let's focus on the topic.

So you say: "he has deep seeded mental issues". Not "He might have.", but "He has".

Then: "Without having a degree in psychology and examining him, theres no way in hell I can make that call.".

Clarify. What's your stance? Just that he had issues?

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
You could have just answered my original question, you didn't. You dodged and just asked ME questions.

I said "Mental issues is generally (Correct or not) said as meaning insane. What do YOU mean?" and asked you to elaborate. You chose not to in your reply, just to ask me questions. This is all irrelevant now, let's focus on the topic.

So you say: "he has deep seeded mental issues". Not "He might have.", but "He has".

Then: "Without having a degree in psychology and examining him, theres no way in hell I can make that call.".

Clarify. What's your stance?

-AC

I never dodged, you are delusional, go back and read it again.

Clarify what? His mental state, or why I cant make that call because I am not a trained professional?

His mental state: Again, he has deep seeded mental issues. not MIGHT, he definitely has a screw or two loose.

Why I cant elaborate on his mental state: BECAUSE I AM NOT A PSYCHOLOGIST.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
you need to point out where I dodged. quote me. show me where I dodged.

I already stated my opinion of the kid, he has deep seeded mental issues. Without having a degree in psychology and examining him, theres no way in hell I can make that call, theres no way I can tell how deep the issues run.

So any person on the street can brand someone with having mental issues, can they? Is it only in severe cases when it needs a professional's opinion? It seems to me that no matter what you meant, you assumed you knew something that you clearly don't.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
So any person on the street can brand someone with having mental issues, can they? Is it only in severe cases when it needs a professional's opinion? It seems to me that no matter what you meant, you assumed you knew something that you clearly don't.
yeah, cuz any person on the street goes home and slaughters their entire family, Maybe he should be a guidance counselor, you think?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
yeah, cuz any person on the street goes home and slaughters their entire family, Maybe he should be a guidance counselor, you think?

There are plenty of killers who have been deemed completely mentally stable, by professionals, not by people on an internet discussion board.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
There are plenty of killers who have been deemed completely mentally stable, by professionals, not by people on an internet discussion board.
And even more who have been deemed completely whacko.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
And even more who have been deemed completely whacko.

I'm afraid I'm going to have to ask you to provide evidence of that.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I never dodged, you are delusional, go back and read it again.

Clarify what? His mental state, or why I cant make that call because I am not a trained professional?

His mental state: Again, he has deep seeded mental issues. not MIGHT, he definitely has a screw or two loose.

Why I cant elaborate on his mental state: BECAUSE I AM NOT A PSYCHOLOGIST.

You did, but it's irrelevant.

Why make the call then say you can't make the call? Seems a bit odd to me. Is that as far as you go? Just saying he has issues?

You're very contradictory here. Either remove the claim that you need to be a psych to know, or remove the claim of "He definitely has issues.". They don't connect.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
And even more who have been deemed completely whacko.

Deemed. Many people deem many people many things that they aren't.

-AC

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
I'm afraid I'm going to have to ask you to provide evidence of that.

ZOMG!!! LOL!

Let me try...

I afraid I'm going to have to ask you to provide evidence that "There are plenty of killers who have been deemed completely mentally stable, by professionals...". 😐

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
You did, but it's irrelevant.

Why make the call then say you can't make the call? Seems a bit odd to me. Is that as far as you go? Just saying he has issues?

You're very contradictory here. Either remove the claim that you need to be a psych to know, or remove the claim of "He definitely has issues.". They don't connect.

-AC

Thats my opinion, that he has something wrong in his head, but hey, I could be wrong. I wasnt there, I dont know him, I didnt know his family. I dont know about the kid personally, but I would say that anyone who does that to his family is fvcked up in some way.

Fair enough point.

-AC

Originally posted by dadudemon
ZOMG!!! LOL!

Let me try...

I afraid I'm going to have to ask you to provide evidence that "There are plenty of killers who have been deemed completely mentally stable, by professionals...". 😐

Well there are plenty. I don't know if there are more or less than those who've been deemed mentally unstable, that's why I wouldn't claim that there were more.

Well first of all, let's examine a basic scenario.

A serial killer is put away because he is a danger to society and his crimes are, to most, "f*cked up". He is not definitely mental just because he did "f*cked up" things, people need to remember that there's a difference, but because it's "f*cked up", people assume you'd HAVE to be mental to do it.

-AC