They weren't Moas, as Moas lacked wings and had much smaller beaks. They were supposed to be Terror Birds, but Terror Birds were extinct long before.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terror_Birds
http://darrennaish.blogspot.com/2006/10/terror-birds.html
They weren't Moas, as Moas lacked wings and had much smaller beaks. They were supposed to be Terror Birds, but Terror Birds were extinct long before.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terror_Birds
http://darrennaish.blogspot.com/2006/10/terror-birds.html
Originally posted by Robtard
They weren't Moas, as Moas lacked wings and had much smaller beaks. They were supposed to be Terror Birds, but Terror Birds were extinct long before.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terror_Birds
http://darrennaish.blogspot.com/2006/10/terror-birds.html
Great. 👆. Seriously, I don't remember anything specific about the birds as I had already made up my mind about them being Giant Moas from the get go...so naturally, I didn't pay attention to the anatomical features such as their atrophied wings..which should have given away, for me, that they were terror birds...in fact, terror birds never crossed my mind. This is why two heads are better than one....or rather, just your head is better than this one. 😄
I found something to confirm what you said:
If you didn't understand jaden, he was taking a shot at your movie interests since you are going to see 2 movies that'll most likely suck and have been known to suck. I can't really blame him either. I find it hard to respect one's taste if they're like "Oh man, Cloverfield sucks. Let me list some GOOD movies! *insert some mediocre/poor films here*"
Originally posted by FistOfThe North
o.. k?your posting of the american dad cartoon was funny, too.....cause he's (kinda) funny....
hmm, i was being serious on that prior, you know.
............. ....
what snake eyes said
the posting of stan was because in one episode he says something which clearly isn't funny...starts laughing and says "that's funny...i'm funny"
i thought i better put the pic in or noone would get the reference
Originally posted by SnakeEyes
If you didn't understand jaden, he was taking a shot at your movie interests since you are going to see 2 movies that'll most likely suck and have been known to suck. I can't really blame him either. I find it hard to respect one's taste if they're like "Oh man, Cloverfield sucks. Let me list some GOOD movies! *insert some mediocre/poor films here*"
you mean "*insert some films snakeeyes thinks are mediocre/poor films, here*"
Thing is, i've never said "jumper" and "10g bc" were good. I haven't even watched 'em yet. (didn't even go home yesterday).
And i heard "jumper" was good and 4 people, since last weekend, have personally told me that they liked "10g bc". But i'll be the judge of that.
And about tastes, people tastes in movies are something i feel indifferent about. To each his own opinion.
I think a person whom regards a persons movie tastes are doing so based on what they like or don't like. And that's dumb. The whole world doesn't revolve around one persons taste or view. Many different people like many different things.
Originally posted by FistOfThe NorthI think a person whom regards a persons movie tastes are doing so based on what they like or don't like. And that's dumb. The whole world doesn't revolve around one persons taste or view. Many different people like many different things.
good point
although try telling your last point to Mark Kermode...i swear that man thinks he is the font of all knowlege when it comes to films
Originally posted by FistOfThe North
Who's Mark Kermode?
http://uk.youtube.com/results?search_query=mark+kermode&search_type=
pick a video and prepare to want to murder someone due to the pretentiousness of the man
Originally posted by jaden101
http://uk.youtube.com/results?search_query=mark+kermode&search_type=pick a video and prepare to want to murder someone due to the pretentiousness of the man
He looks like a tosser. Should have his ass kicked just for that.