Call of Duty: World at War

Originally posted by Blax_Hydralisk
I would seriously get this game if you could play as the Nazis in single player campaign.

Seriously. The chance to kill Canadians, Brits, Americans, Brits, Polish, and Aussies is just too good to be true.

liberals wouldn't like that very much

Originally posted by ragesRemorse
liberals wouldn't like that very much

fail

Originally posted by @st
This is one of the dumbest gaming decisions ive seen not involving Sony. They gained a assload of fans with CoD 4, now they are gonna go back to an unpopular setting with an inferior developer. People who dont know much about gaming who liked CoD4 will play this and be disappointed, and wont give Infinity Ward's next version a chance.

Pretty much.

Originally posted by Schecter
fail

liberal

I dont think its that retarded to change the setting, I think its more retarded to continue the same game.

They should keep Call of Duty series on the lay low for awhile, because another Call of Duty, even if its a modern setting will become tired and outdated.

They should start another franchise, or something different. I dont think I would be excited to play another Call of Duty game.

Originally posted by Smasandian
They should start another franchise, or something different. I dont think I would be excited to play another Call of Duty game.

call of duty 2525~

YouTube video

oh snaps!

I really hope that Infinity Ward will head up COD 5 and not go back in time to WWII. Biiiiiiiiig mistake, if you ask me.

Originally posted by Impediment
I really hope that Infinity Ward will head up COD 5 and not go back in time to WWII

That's too late, it's already confirmed that CoD 5 is WWII and not by IW.

It makes you wonder, why do they makes these awful decisions?

It will still sell well.

I dont understand the big deal about this. It will still sell well.

regardless I won't be getting it, in fact COD4 is the only COD game I own or have played, and I think it shall stay this way.

Originally posted by Smasandian
It will still sell well.

I dont understand the big deal about this. It will still sell well.

We are tired of playing WW2 games.

Well...I really liked COD 1 when it first came out on xbox, it really made me happy. Then I really liked and bought COD 2...didn't buy COD 3, but borrowed from a friend and beat it, nothing huge but not bad. I bought COD 4 and it was great, loved it. Odds are...I will probably buy this one too...especially if you can play as a German.

Originally posted by Elite Hunter
We are tired of playing WW2 games.

The thing is that the difference between Call of Duty 2 and Call of Duty 4 is purely the setting.

It's still going to be a great FPS, no matter the setting.

I actually think the game would of been great if IW did another WW2 shooter, but with update graphics. I would play it.

unless they can simulate the thousands of soldiers on screen at once in D-Day I'm not buying it

That would be epic.

Then it would be dynasty warriors of the future.

Originally posted by Smasandian
The thing is that the difference between Call of Duty 2 and Call of Duty 4 is purely the setting.

You can say that for any FPS, though. Most FPS's follow a similar forumla. The biggest differences is the setting. Instead of a barret on a rifle.. you have an energy sword. Instead of a single shot rifle you have a sniper rifle, or a carbine.

Very rough translations, but you get my point.

I'm sorry but not really.

Halo is different than Call of Duty. They dont follow the same formula at all.
The only thing that is the same with Halo and COD is that you shoot people, but the game is completely different.

The difference between Call of Duty 1, 2 and 3 and COD4 is pure setting. Some modern guns and helicopters and instead of shooting a turret in a modern plane, your shooting planes down in an B-17.

I think they should stick to modern(sequel) or switch over to vietnam(jungle). Either way i still trust that Treyarch will make the game somewhat good.

If they call of duty 5 ain't a sequel to cod4 then cod6 will.