Originally posted by Papa Smurph
What evidence and debating?
Holy failure to see sarcasm Batman!
Originally posted by Papa Smurph
I pointed out Captain Atom would lose to WWH in WWH (and it's obvious he would)
No you assume he would. It didn't happen and Hulk lost in the end. Pak could easily have written WWH with Atom involved and had Nate be the one that blasted him into the ground at the end.
You're making baseless, meaningless assumptions.
Originally posted by Papa Smurph
I don't see where the argument is besides batdude ducking theoreticals and applying board rules to Comics.
Crazy isn't he? It's like he thinks we're on a forum or something.
Originally posted by psycho gundam
I'm noticing that papa smurph, tricksterpriest, batdude 123, and symmentric chaos are a volatile combination.
Nah 😎
Originally posted by Symmetric ChaosCrazy isn't he? It's like he thinks we're on a forum or something.
Yeah, and we're arguing about portrayals in comics, we're not arguing powersets, we're dipping into character and intention now, which goes a bit beyond the feat hunting "debates" that these things typically devolve into and require a lil bit of critical thinking. Pak wouldn't have written Captain Atom to beat Hulk and you know it shoooot most of the arc was devoted to hyping up a Sentry/Hulk climax and it was OBVIOUS that, that was the only person who would take him.
Calling out Pak's credibility doesn't really mean much because when writers write the comics they aren't thinking about _____ (feat/rarely used ability/obscure fact from 5 years ago), they're thinking about the average portrayal.