Originally posted by JacopeX
Look around the thread. This is all an insult towards me. *facepalm*
Originally posted by chillmeistergenJacope, you are woefully naïve and more than a little annoying, but I don't consider you stupid. Hence why I didn't vote for you. But chill is correct.
No it isn't, there're three nominees and users can nominate whoever else they want. It was a painstaking process narrowing the nominees down and though you were included, it's nothing personal.
I reported the thread anyway, I'm more on your side than his.
Originally posted by chillmeistergenYou are the most ignorant prick ever.
No it isn't, there're three nominees and users can nominate whoever else they want. It was a painstaking process narrowing the nominees down and though you were included, it's nothing personal.
You already knew that with Mclovin and many others online trying to find a way to get me back with a problem that was started by them that the thread would have my name voted highest with their help. This is a bash thread all towards me as JAckie and Debbiejo are not here at the moment to witness this but me. Why? Because some members are just butt hurt.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
How are we defining stupid?Stupid as in completely retarded in every way, stupid as in someone who makes intelligible posts but stupid points?
Are we allowed to name anyone from any time, or current members only?
-AC
The definition is up to you, I feel that the nominees I have elected cover three different types of stupid. However, no matter what kind of definition you use, your vote will be counted along with the others.
You may nominate any user, past or present.