Originally posted by DigiMark007Since there's so many they can rotate. Gotta make sure that your team is "taken care of". Since it is for the other teams I fought to get this strat to work.
😂Well, in that scenario Thor would still have better stamina than anyone else, so he'd win by default once everyone else had passed out in a mound of satisfied flesh.
You don't need to worry about winning. My matches are simply the fan service section of the comic. Like resting between your actual matches.
This is ridiculous. I am going to remind everyone of the rules.
Rules.
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f77/t477386.html
Motivation: The winners will each be granted their single most fondest wish. The losers will see their single most loved one destroyed/killed/obliterated.
#2 Characters will act in-character. If character nature dictates it, there can be in-fighting amongst team members despite the motivation. Warlock will only use the soul suck as a last resort against a ruthless villain who is killing his teammates, never on a hero. Same with Blackbolt’s scream or Thor’s godblast.
#9 Victory is gained by killing, knocking unconscious, or immobilizing all of your opponents for 10 continuous minutes.
Follow them.
Kinda what I was thinking, even though I can appreciate the humor of Cresh's plan. Because right now Cresh is up 3-1, and I'm staring down the prospect of having to beat goober and somebody else in order to move on at all in this tourney, and also at the prospect of losing to someone who literally can't harm my team.
All because people are too immature to vote objectively, or at least for the only person to have posited an actual way to wins the fight (multiple ways, actually), and instead feel the need to vote for Cresh because he said the word lesbians.
Nice job guys. I suppose I'll be justified in voting for anyone who's obviously losing though from this point on in the tourney, since apparently as long as we include an lol smilie or snappy one-liner in our reasoning, we can vote for whoever we want.
...not mad at Cresh, btw. He's aware of what he's doing and just having a good time. No participant is obligated to take this seriously....so I can respect that (and it is amusing, in and of itself). But the judges should, and that's the problem.
...feels kinda cheap to be invalidating things on technicalities. At least keep the last one, since the other two are at least invalidated by a previously-established rule. If Cresh legitimately found what KMC judges are looking for, as sad a statement as that is about our collective objectivity, I'd rather lose to that than get handouts from a tourney host who is sympathetic and sees the light, but has to bend her own rules in order to get me the win. It just wouldn't be right.
Originally posted by DigiMark007
...feels kinda cheap to be invalidating things on technicalities. At least keep the last one, since the other two are at least invalidated by a previously-established rule. If Cresh legitimately found what KMC judges are looking for, as sad a statement as that is about our collective objectivity, I'd rather lose to that than get handouts from a tourney host who is sympathetic and sees the light, but has to bend her own rules in order to get me the win. It just wouldn't be right.
So noble....or is it?
I explicitly stated over and over again that you cannot vote within the first 12 hours of the match. I didn't invalidate anything because they voted too early in the debate. This rule is there not only to let participants to debate freely, but to allow the voters to get over the initial shock of any plan and vote objectively later on. I also want a confirmation on the last vote because joke votes are not uncommon. Also, the rules regarding combat must be followed. They are not "suggestions", they are hard rules.