Originally posted by Gideon
Every other source disagrees, Blax, and I would point out that if Obi-Wan, despite lesser training and inferior experience, was "more skilled" than Darth Maul, how come Kenobi's confirmed superior [Qui-Gon] failed to defeat the Sith Lord? Better yet, how come the two of them combined weren't enough to overwhelm him? The only time that Obi-Wan had the "edge" in combat over Maul is when he briefly gave into his anger. And that was a temporary advantage, as Maul relieved him of his lightsaber and toppled him into the melting pit.No one here is fellating him. As I said, he doesn't stand a chance against Yoda in combat, but really -- TPM Obi-Wan superior to him? I don't think so.
an imperfect source (the jedi council), confirmed qui-gon as superior to obi wan.
but obi wan was younger and had more stamina, qui-gon was past his prime. so i say tpm obi is better, after all he won right
Actually, Obi-Wan while raging was able to temporarily overcome Maul, but in the end it was this lack of focus which allowed a simple Force push to unbalance him and nearly lose the fight. Obi-Wan was simply not better than Maul at this point, though he sure as hell put him on his ass pretty quick. Any later incarnation of Obi-Wan would probably win, though.