Seifer vs. Pyron

gameplay have been shown, but the powers are all real, and their documented well on the site ive shown 101 times, Darkchronicle, and your wrong, nothing says "weak enemies" you simply assume just because the true GAMEPLAY MECHANIC of "boss" simply draws the conclusion that anyone powerful is able to resist, unfortunatley, game mechanics like that one, are not canon or taken into account

Originally posted by Burning thought
gameplay have been shown, but the powers are all real, and their documented well on the site ive shown 101 times, Darkchronicle, and your wrong, nothing says "weak enemies" you simply assume just because the true [b]GAMEPLAY MECHANIC of "boss" simply draws the conclusion that anyone powerful is able to resist, unfortunatley, game mechanics like that one, are not canon or taken into account [/B]

woah woah woah, when did i say they are used anywhere other than gameplay? I just told you their documented as real abilities, their in the speech when he gets most of them, their spoken of, they excist which is enough and their power is documented

Oh, they exist, I never said they did not, but they are only shown in gameplay, where they only kill weak enemies.

no, its never stated such, you simply cannot target bosses, for obvious gameplay balance, the fact that the spell is documented as to be able to take almost anything, both human (which half the bosses are which further bismerches the "zomg boss" cr@p) and vampire or demon

Originally posted by IdiotGod
Goddam retards on this forum, man.

FFS! Watch your mouth.. There are PLENTY of great people on this forum..

Originally posted by Dark-Jaxx
Gameplay and game mechanics are nearly the same thing, mechanics being in the gameplay. In fact, I noticed that alot of Kain arguments are wholly gameplay.

Wrong..

its okie Darth, reported him for profanity and insulting, this is not to be taken, especially from someone both new who is boldly breaking rules and is not adding anything to the forum apart from foolery and rule breaking

Originally posted by Burning thought
no, its never stated such, you simply cannot target bosses, for obvious gameplay balance, the fact that the spell is documented as to be able to take almost anything, both human (which half the bosses are which further bismerches the "zomg boss" cr@p) and vampire or demon

Originally posted by Dark-Jaxx
Fact is, it is only SHOWN in gameplay, meaning you have to take the bad with the good, in gameplay, the only place it is shown, it only hurts weak enemies.

fact is it IS only SHOWN but that means what in a debate? nothing, however i can SHOW you the documentation on what the move actually does and is, and it works on all enemies except bosses because of a gameplay mechnic which is not taken into account in debates

Originally posted by Darth Extecute
Wrong..

Which part of what he said is wrong?
They both seem pretty right and spot on to me.

Originally posted by Darth Extecute
FFS! Watch your mouth.. There are PLENTY of great people on this forum..

I guess so. But not many of them seem to post in Game Vs.

Originally posted by IdiotGod
Which part of what he said is wrong?
They both seem pretty right and spot on to me.

I guess so. But not many of them seem to post in Game Vs.

The first part.. and I know you think it's right on the spot, because that's pretty much what you've been saying in the past three threads..

They do.. They just havent had the missfortune of meeting you yet..

I like the high and mighty attitude.
Makes it funny knowing you and BT think you're smart but in reality you're both just giant fanboys who can't prove up.
I'm still waiting for the distance perception evidence...of course when called on it you conveniently refused to answer.
I guess it's my fault for thinking you could debate.

Originally posted by IdiotGod
I guess it's my fault

Yes it is.. Your contagious..

Awesome. I can bring down this forum, rid of it losers like you and BT and maybe get real debaters posting.

Originally posted by IdiotGod
Awesome. I can bring down this forum, rid of it losers like you and BT and maybe get real debaters posting.

I'm not taking a side, but this IMO was just too funny.

Originally posted by IdiotGod
Awesome. I can bring down this forum, rid of it losers like you and BT and maybe get real debaters posting.

Ah yes, you do that..

IdiotGod, knock it off. Crap like that's not acceptable.

Originally posted by Dark-Jaxx
😆 😂

I'm not taking a side, but this IMO was just too funny.

*bows* I try.

Originally posted by Lana
IdiotGod, knock it off. Crap like that's not acceptable.

Kay. Apologies.

Originally posted by IdiotGod
I like the high and mighty attitude.
Makes it funny knowing you and BT think you're smart but in reality you're both just giant fanboys who can't prove up.
I'm still waiting for the distance perception evidence...of course when called on it you conveniently refused to answer.
I guess it's my fault for thinking you could debate.

we have, the video youve already posted of him 🙂 and its your fault for not understanding evidence or posts

Originally posted by IdiotGod
Awesome. I can bring down this forum, rid of it losers like you and BT and maybe get real debaters posting.

IdiotGods dictionary:

real debater: Someone who does not debate against me, and who agrees with my points even when i have no arguments

😆