Originally posted by WrathfulDwarf
What do you guys think? Should politics and propaganda be allowed in this global sporting event?What about other events like the World Cup...or the World Series...or Superbowl...or the NBA finals...or...oh, well, you get the idea.
If the Chinese Constitution allows the right to assembly.
Originally posted by red g jacks
my favorite was the time when those black competitors threw up a "black fist" after they won their medals and that white dude was stuck standing there like .......
Yep, Mexico City 1968. I have the photograph hanging in my office and the whiteboy standing on the 3rd place spot looked pretty damn uncomfortable.
Well China shouldn't even have been given the olympics in the first place imo, however I doesn't think a boycot is the way to archive better human rights and a larger degree of independence for Tibet. imo a Boycot against a given country when OL oriented is depending on two things, that's it a unified world performing the boycot and that the majority of the native population is aware of there being a problem, The first criteria isn't forfilled, The second is hard to gauge based on the level of information controlling from China but my assumption would be that the criteria isn't forfilled either, and if I remember correctly the only time where a Boycot have actually had a visible effect was in Southafrica
Protests however is fine by me, but the type of demonstration that the world have seen lately, with the flame being stolen ore extinguish and the sportsmen being covered with a ring of Policemen doesn't quiet illustrate the original idea with the olympic games.
Originally posted by WrathfulDwarfProbably. China doesn't seem too stuck up on morality really. They'd probably sell a province and all the people for some money.
Can we buy Tibet from China?No, seriously...no joking...can the European or the US government can offer to buy the nation's indepence from China?
Can such a thing be done?
Even if it sounds stupid. Can it be done?