Superman Prime Vs Galactus

Originally posted by fangirl101
those blast destroyed Solar Systems. Superboy Prime Survived a universe blowing up in his face at point blank range. And Direct contact with anti-matter wave energy. what are you talking about?

Thats why i put a concentrated blast. Superman prime survived the explosion sure( survived and was unconscious anyway) but i doubt he wud have fared as well if all the force was concentrated on him in a single energy beam. If galactus uses concentrated blasts but of the same power as his annihilation blast, superman prime will go down quick.

Originally posted by ultimatethor
Thats why i put a concentrated blast. Superman prime survived the explosion sure( survived and was unconscious anyway) but i doubt he wud have fared as well if all the force was concentrated on him in a single energy beam. If galactus uses concentrated blasts but of the same power as his annihilation blast, superman prime will go down quick.

First. Wasn't the universe blast more of a chain reaction then a single big bang?

Second. Didn't prime Survive because of the Timekeeper?

Third. Wasn't it only all life and so that was exterminated, the Planet for instance remains intact when the Monitor acts as narrator we see him on the planet, at the last page and his own Shield withstood the blast, shielding the small tree ore whatever it is but that didn't cover a entire planet.

Originally posted by fangirl101
Superboy prime was at ground zero of a universe destroying blast. And his amp had run out. So what makes you think that with his amp, galactus concentrating a star system blast is going to do anything?

Even being at ground zero of a universe destroying blast is not the same as taking the same blast in one continuous energy beam to the chest. Depending on the nature of the blast(Explosion/Wave/disintegration blast), the difference between a universe destroying attack and a solar system destroying attack may just be the range. While the range of one encompasses only solar systems the range of the other encompasses a universe. The destructive capacity of the energy itself may not be so different. However, regardless of the range of the blast, concentrating it into one continuos energy beam focused on one target, will be far more deadly to the target than if the force is spread out in one huge explosion.

Originally posted by ultimatethor
Even being at ground zero of a universe destroying blast is not the same as taking the same blast in one continuous energy beam to the chest. Depending on the nature of the blast(Explosion/Wave/disintegration blast), the difference between a universe destroying attack and a solar system destroying attack may just be the range. While the range of one encompasses only solar systems the range of the other encompasses a universe. The destructive capacity of the energy itself may not be so different. However, regardless of the range of the blast, concentrating it into one continuos energy beam focused on one target, will be far more deadly to the target than if the force is spread out in one huge explosion.

I'm speechless..wow 🤣

Originally posted by Utrigita
First. Wasn't the universe blast more of a chain reaction then a single big bang?

Second. Didn't prime Survive because of the Timekeeper?

Third. Wasn't it only all life and so that was exterminated, the Planet for instance remains intact when the Monitor acts as narrator we see him on the planet, at the last page and his own Shield withstood the blast, shielding the small tree ore whatever it is but that didn't cover a entire planet.

Originally posted by ultimatethor
Even being at ground zero of a universe destroying blast is not the same as taking the same blast in one continuous energy beam to the chest. Depending on the nature of the blast(Explosion/Wave/disintegration blast), the difference between a universe destroying attack and a solar system destroying attack may just be the range. While the range of one encompasses only solar systems the range of the other encompasses a universe. The destructive capacity of the energy itself may not be so different. However, regardless of the range of the blast, concentrating it into one continuos energy beam focused on one target, will be far more deadly to the target than if the force is spread out in one huge explosion.

Galactus can win by bfr, red sun light, and probably old school overpowering -depending how hungry he is-; he also has the UN, can mind-rape, absorb all the solar energy from Prime, transmutate the sun so Prime runs out of energy.

I don't know, use your imagination! Even if Prime was more powerful -which I don't think he is-, this is still the Hulk against the Silver Surfer as a battle. Galactus's versatility owns Prime's.

Originally posted by fangirl101
I'm not speechless. It's just that I won't insult you. You've done enough with this post.

Done enough? Please dont make me laugh, actually take up the points ive made and disprove them not follow the lead of skygunner whatever his name who deosnt have the ability to contributes to any debate. Here ill list them out for u

1. Concentrating an energy beam makes it far far more powerful
2. A single target surviving an explosion of energy is completely different from surviving all the power of that explosion concentrated into a continuous energy beam.

Originally posted by Bentley
Galactus can win by bfr, red sun light, and probably old school overpowering -depending how hungry he is-; he also has the UN, can mind-rape, absorb all the solar energy from Prime, transmutate the sun so Prime runs out of energy.

I don't know, use your imagination! Even if Prime was more powerful -which I don't think he is-, this is still the Hulk against the Silver Surfer as a battle. Galactus's versatility owns Prime's.

I was unware that Prime could BFR'd with his gaurdian amp. Also I'd figured that the Gaurdian Amp protected him from Red Sunlight. The UN is not standard gear for galactus. How many beings has Galactus mind raped?

Originally posted by skygunner41
I'm speechless..wow 🤣

I think thats best for all of us. 🙄

Originally posted by ultimatethor
I think thats best for all of us. 🙄

Really how big is universe compare to solar systems according to you...? 😆

So Universal destruction <<< Concentrated solar system destrustion blast...yep just great. 🤣

Originally posted by skygunner41
Really how big is universe compare to solar systems according to you...? 😆

eer What? U dont have the ability to comprehend what im sayin. What does the size of a universe in comparison to the size of solar systems even remotely relevant to what i was sayin? Are u OK? I was talkin about how concentrating an explosion into one continuous energy beam and focusing it on one target makes it far more destructive and ur busy talkin gibberish. 🙁

Originally posted by ultimatethor
Are u OK? . 🙁

ARE U?

Originally posted by skygunner41

So Universal destruction <<< Concentrated solar system destrustion blast...yep just great. 🤣

R u dense? Did u not see were i said depending on the nature of the blast and talked about range? Way to take things out of context. 😬

Originally posted by ultimatethor
R u dense? Did u not see were i said depending on the nature of the blast and talked about range? Way to take things out of context. 😬

So ...It like comparing continuing blast of rocket launcher against a nuke blast.

Galactus has the means to put down Guardian Amped Superman Prime. The big question is if he will be smart enough to use those means before Prime starts punching shit off.

And BTW I am not an expert on Guardians...but GASMP was travelling the multiverse at will. I don't think it will be that simple to BFR him.

This also depends on how hungry Big G is, but I am confident he takes most of the wins.

A few things:

That was a severely weakened and drained Galactus who destroyed three solar systems and 37% of the Annihilation Wave.

Galactus has the power to destroy the entire 616 universe and the Negative Zone at once.

If Scarlet Witch's Chaos Wave was a chain reaction, then Monarch's blast certainly was. It definitely didn't consume everything instantly, as proven on panel.

The Guardian Amp simply increased Prime's power and artificially aged him (as Monarch points out), it does not give him a Guardian's abilities. Meaning his weakness to Red Sunlight is still valid.

Prime was only able to BFR an incomplete, severely weakened by a galaxy destroying blast Anti-Monitor. He's got zero shot against a healthy Galactus.

G easy

Originally posted by Enyalus
A few things:

That was a severely weakened and drained Galactus who destroyed three solar systems and 37% of the Annihilation Wave.

Galactus has the power to destroy the entire 616 universe and the Negative Zone at once.

If Scarlet Witch's Chaos Wave was a chain reaction, then Monarch's blast certainly was. It definitely didn't consume everything instantly, as proven on panel.

The Guardian Amp simply increased Prime's power and artificially aged him (as Monarch points out), it does not give him a Guardian's abilities. Meaning his weakness to Red Sunlight is still valid.

Prime was only able to BFR an incomplete, severely weakened by a galaxy destroying blast Anti-Monitor. He's got zero shot against a healthy Galactus.

Prime wasn't gaurdian amped when he bfr'd the Am. That point is thus invalid.
Superboy prime's gaurdian amp certainly did remove his weakness to red sunlight. As Sodam yat's ring was reversing the effects of lead poising. don't you think a guardian's power would over ride the weakness of red sunlight? And monarch's blast did destroy that universe in one fell swoop. Had it not, the monitors would have been able to contain an ever exanding "chain reaction".