Galactus vs unicron

Originally posted by Soljer
A multiverse need not consist of an [b]infinite number of universes.

It could consist of three, four, or fifty-two, for example. [/B]

but DC's multiverse = infinite as well, according to Rip. *shrugs*

Originally posted by Utrigita
Very impressive.

It's the narrator talking correct???

The narrator is Vector Prime one of the original 13 Transformers.

It's accepted

Originally posted by Galan007
Unless you're affecting an infinite amount of Universes, then you aren't causing 'true' Multiversal damage.

I can see that but causing damage to more then a single universe at the time could imo count as a multiversal battle too.

Originally posted by Utrigita
I can see that but causing damage to more then a single universe at the time could imo count as a multiversal battle too.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TG4GaPcLgOs
ooohhhh shiiit...

Originally posted by Galan007
Yet it still wouldn't be 'true' multiversal damage.

No it wouldn't, but still as a battle that damaged more then a single universe but multiply universes unless we shall invent two universal battle.

Originally posted by Galan007

Galactus has never come close to destroying a universe,
without outside 'assistance'.

The whole point behind the Black Celestial arc was to show us what Galactus was capable of,
(it was a future-self of Galactus 616 after all)
without needing to present this capability through the normal under control 616 Galactus,
cause again,
it's simply not in his interest to do that, quite the contrary in fact,
as we know Galactus is part of the Cosmic Hierarchy,
and Galactus has always been there when it came to defending and preserving the Universe.

Unlike Unicron who was a rogue entity acting on his own behalf.

Galactus while not bound by entity or concept,
does follow protocol for the sake of Cosmic consonance,
one of those protocols is do not feed on more than one planet a month (basically speaking)

But when necessary,
Galactus has proven he can absorb and/or destroy far more than a Planet.

Who wins? No comment.

Just wanted to point that out about why Galactus doesn't go around killing universes.

Galactus

Originally posted by Utrigita

I can see that but causing damage to more then a single universe at the time

could imo count as a multiversal battle too.

Imo (from what I've gathered through time)

Universal (single reality)

Multi-Universal (two realities or more) - but if 616 is included it's like multiversal.

Multiversal (all universes in a multiverse)

Trans-Multiversal (more than one multiverse) depending on, this could mean everything.

Megaversal (a collection of multiverseS) how many exactly is a mystery.

Omniversal (all of the above) all reality/all creation/all existence/all possibilities.

Originally posted by Mr Master
That scenario would be better phrased as a "Multi-Universal" feat.

Imo (from what I've gathered through time)

Universal (single reality)

Multi-Universal (two realities or more) - but if 616 is included it's like multiversal.

Multiversal (all universes in a multiverse)

Trans-Multiversal (more than one multiverse) depending on, this could mean everything.

Megaversal (a collection of multiverseS) how many exactly is a mystery.

Omniversal (all of the above) all reality/all creation/all existence/all possibilities.

Okay cool all those different levels of damage spreading can be confusing at times.

Unicron.