Poll
8%
31%
61%
Entertainment Weekly published a story that may be cause for concern -about a split between Ed Norton & Louis Letterier and Marvel Productions. Marvel is forcing a shorter running time of two hours; the director & star were looking for a longer film ( 2 hours 15 min.) Norton's not talking to the press right now.
Then again, he has a rep for interfering behind the scenes on films and being a pain in the ass. If they want a longer cut for a more cerebral film, that was the problem with the last one.
It will be an embarrassment for Marvel, if they can't get the Hulk right after two big-budget tries.
Originally posted by grey fox
The first film is highly under-rated. This film will be garbage, acting (so-far) looks shoddy, cg is piss-poor (I've seen video-games with better graphics) and the vaunted '26 minuite' fight scene will blow chunks.
I have to vehemently disagree. I think the new CGI model for the Hulk looks much better. Also, Edward Norton, like Eric Bana is a splendid actor. Also, Norton has the look and has a greater understanding of the characters.
Originally posted by Grinning Goku
I have to vehemently disagree. I think the new CGI model for the Hulk looks much better. Also, Edward Norton, like Eric Bana is a splendid actor. Also, Norton has the look and has a greater understanding of the characters.
i co sighn on what you just said. the cgi for the new hulk looks great. the beef with ang lee's movie was that he focused on the anger and strengh and no real hulk action
Originally posted by grey fox
The first film is highly under-rated. This film will be garbage, acting (so-far) looks shoddy, cg is piss-poor (I've seen video-games with better graphics) and the vaunted '26 minuite' fight scene will blow chunks.
Although, im not partial to the idea of Norton being cast as Banner. I have confidence that he will pull it off as will the rest of the cast. I do, however, have great reservations when it comes to the effects. The effects do look a bit dodgy, but i will hold all judgments until its release. Some of the effects in the iron man trailers looked questionable. The scene where iron man fires a rocket at the tank looked just like a cartoon in the trailer, but in the movie, it looked fantastic. I do think the design of the Hulk is much more appropriate than Li's version, but in defense of li, his movie had some very fine effects. The Ang li CGI suffered from poor character design's, but the effects in general were handled very well.
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Personally, I don't like the look of the new Hulk. He's clearly supposed to look like Banner which was jarring considering I don't think anyone has ever render Hulk that way.
Maybe they figured it made sense. Why not? Otherwise, they're just two completely seperate beings. And Professor Hulk resembled Bruce Banner, remember.
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Personally, I don't like the look of the new Hulk. He's clearly supposed to look like Banner which was jarring considering I don't think anyone has ever render Hulk that way.
Re: Fears about The Incredible Hulk
Originally posted by scuzz
everyone i know thought this was a sequal! the trailer looks great and this movie looks amazing but will anyone be able to see past the crapfest that was hulk?i hope this movie is huge but is it to soon after lee's attempt to be a success?
The trailer is alright. The Hulk looks absolutely trash.
I'm one of the few people who actually enjoyed the first Hulk. Lee did a fine job in my book. I guess there just wasn't enough action for some.
As far as success goes, I think it will do relatively well, especially with Iron Man setting the pace for comic book moves this summer.