Warp Straffing

01001001 00100000 01110100 01101000 01101001 01101110 01101011 00100000 01110110 01101111 01111001 01100001 01100111 01100101 01110010 00100000 01110101 01110011 01100101 01100100 00100000 01101001 01110100 00100000 01110100 01101111 01101111 00101110

use this site:
http://www.paulschou.com/tools/xlate/

hahaha...that's ace...^^

I honestly can't remember any instances of ships firing any kind of beam weapons while in warp though I wouldn't be surprised if there are some.

Originally posted by Doctor-Alvis
I honestly can't remember any instances of ships firing any kind of beam weapons while in warp though I wouldn't be surprised if there are some.

voyager had a couple... message in a bottle, with the prometheus class ship, is the most obvious one...

of course phasers arent supposed to work at warp, but star trek seems content to break that rule enough...

Originally posted by Raoul
voyager had a couple... message in a bottle, with the prometheus class ship, is the most obvious one...

of course phasers arent supposed to work at warp, but star trek seems content to break that rule enough...

Problems with physics? Use subspace.

Originally posted by Acrosurge
They explain it away by generating a "subspace jacket" around the phaser blast.

Problems with physics? Use subspace.

Or tachyons.

Originally posted by Acrosurge
They explain it away by generating a "subspace jacket" around the phaser blast.

Problems with physics? Use subspace.

when was that?

Originally posted by Raoul
when was that?

Originally posted by Acrosurge
DS9 tech manual, methinks, which puts it into "not quite canon" territory. Still, its as good an explanation as any, especially since there are too many instances of phasers at warp to pass it off as writer error.

true, true...