Originally posted by OneDumbG0 But then you had to go and accuse me of accusing you of lying through gibberish.
Nowhere did I do such a thing in my two posts.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0 you describe lies in the first scan below.
So, it seems
this is another lie?
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=483307&pagenumber=2
(15th Post)
Originally posted by OneDumbG0 Even past that, you continue to waste space
by explaining your scans as if you had something to add or debate. [/B]
I wasn't trying to add anything to the debate.
I was only disproving your Dr Strange exaggerations.
And I did disprove them.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0 For instance,
I already pointed out myself that Dormammu incarnated himself in the flesh.
That surely didn't stop you from rescanning the same scan, resizing it,
quoting in italics and then posturing as if you're rebutting some point of mine.[/B]
And yet you started your post with,
"Stipulation?" ... hum
And you're right,
it didn't stop me from pointing that stipulation out,
which you seemed to have addressed but dismissed as a "nitpick."
it's not a "nitpick,"
it's simply the reason why Strange won.
Like I said from the beginning ... he defeats Dormy with stipulations.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0 I won't tell you how to spend your energy, but it's pretty misdirected.[/B]
Get this pompous garbage out of here dogs.
Atleast I don't bull shit
or make claims coming out of my ass.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0 Me: Yeah, he's 27 years old.
You: No he's not! He's a little older then 27 years old!
Me: Yeah, ok. That's true too. In fact, he is 27 and a half years old. But that's technically 27 years old.
You: Let me get his birth certificate! See here! He's 27 and 7 months old! Read it and weep! Don't accuse me of lying in the future!
Me: Yeah... okie dokie.[/B]
Gibberish, this off-topic inconsequential drivel.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0 That pretty much characterizes most of your posts thereafter.
A focused rebuttal of something that I already know and pointed out myself. Waste of space. [/B]
1. You pointed out that Strange defeated Dormy without stipulations,
when in fact, the exact battle you post involves a stipulation.
2. You pointed out that Strange defeated the In-Betweener,
when in fact, it was Lord Order and Master Chaos' power that defeated the IB.
3. You pointed out that Strange defeated Death twice,
when in fact, Strange has never defeated Death even once in battle.
4. You pointed out that Strange held his own against Warlock w/IG,
when in fact, Warlock was never trying to hurt Strange,
and when in fact, Warlock used the Gems separately,
when in fact, Warlock only tried to hurt Strange once ... with the Power Gem ALONE!,
when in fact, Strange had Prep and All his Talismans combined,
and still got owned immediately, and nearly obliterated by the Power Gem ALONE!
5. You pointed out that Strange opposed the LT's will twice,
when in fact, the LT was only testing Strange to use him the first time around,
and the second time, while the LT battled Nebulos,
the LT gestured Strange away twice instead.
.......................................................................................
So basically, you were wrong on all 5 points,
that you supposedly already knew about.
Waste of space indeed. (on your part though)
Originally posted by OneDumbG0 Especially when I provided the scans already
so that everyone else could see what I was talking
about and form their own opinions.
I only clarified what I was referring to in my original post.
Actually you tried to explain what was going on in the scans,
I won't say you were lying, like you accused me of,
I rather say you simply didn't know what you were talking about.
The on panel facts speak for themselves.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0 I didn't go about trying to prove anything.
So please don't inject anything into it past that.
I never said you was trying to prove anything in your first post,
but the info you were posting was simply wrong.
Imo, you're not a jerk, a troll or liar because of it.
But in your second post replying to me, you do try and prove you're right,
with sarcasm and an arrogant undertone,
which is laughable considering you were still wrong.
I debate with love and respect, so long as the other party (such as yourself)
returns the same courtesy as I.
