Originally posted by dadudemon
I was a highly trained athlete. I ran track and filed and played football. I put up some very impressive numbers in power lifting competitions. I would be an example, physically, of a superior male...I was pointing out that even I was inferior to the world's best women, meaning that the line isn't as clear as was presented in the information inimilist provided. Was that point not clear for you?
Please, for God's sake - get a blog. I for one am getting tired of hearing about every personal achievement in your life.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Oh golly, more things of note.
Indeed.
Originally posted by smoker4
My internet hero.
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Please, for God's sake - get a blog. I for one am getting tired of hearing about every personal achievement in your life.
LOL. All three of the above people missed my point. Thanks for being a**holes instead! You guys are the best! 😄
Originally posted by Bardock42
My, my, we sure missed your point. Your points are just to complicated for such simple minds as us.
No. You've got it wrong. You choose to ignore the point to be a**holes. Don't worry, I'm not pissed because I know being an a**hole is fun. God forbid I make a point about being inferior to women.
Its the internet, where else can you do that? 😖hifty:
Originally posted by dadudemon
No. You've got it wrong. You choose to ignore the point to be a**holes. Don't worry, I'm not pissed because I know being an a**hole is fun. God forbid I make a point about being inferior to women.Its the internet, where else can you do that? 😖hifty:
But wouldn't that mean you got it wrong first and then I got it wrong by agreeing with you?
Also, no one is annoyed with your point about being inferior to women, we were well aware of that fact.
Originally posted by dadudemon
No. You've got it wrong. You choose to ignore the point to be a**holes. Don't worry, I'm not pissed because I know being an a**hole is fun. God forbid I make a point about being inferior to women.Its the internet, where else can you do that? 😖hifty:
Yeah, you're right. I wish I could make such a unconventional and challenging point, yet still keep my narcissistic tendencies to a minimum.
Originally posted by Bardock42
But wouldn't that mean you got it wrong first and then I got it wrong by agreeing with you?
Sort of...but not really. You and I both know that I knew what your points were. You and I both know that I knew that you guys were choosing to ignore that to instead be internet a**holes because you guys like doing that.
And now, you and I both know you are pulling a typical Bardock by splitting hairs.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Also, no one is annoyed with your point about being inferior to women, we were well aware of that fact.
You and I both know what you are implying by NOT saying it, but would my point carry as much weight I didn't first indicate that I wasn't just some average joe?
Edit-
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Yeah, you're right. I wish I could make such a unconventional and challenging point, yet still keep my narcissistic tendencies to a minimum.
Wow, your sarcasm is just amazing. 😐
Originally posted by dadudemon
Sort of...but not really. You and I both know that I knew what your points were. You and I both know that I knew that you guys were choosing to ignore that to instead be internet a**holes because you guys like doing that.And now, you and I both know you are pulling a typical Bardock by splitting hairs.
So, what you are saying is that I was absolutely correct?
Originally posted by dadudemon
You and I both know what you are implying by NOT saying it, but would my point carry as much weight I didn't first indicate that I wasn't just some average joe?
More.
Originally posted by dadudemon
You and I both know what you are implying by NOT saying it, but would my point carry as much weight I didn't first indicate that I wasn't just some average joe?
Is "you and I both know" the phrase of the day?
Also, no I don't agree, your point would of held validity without having to tell us how amazingly unique you are. The point is not something that is enforced by experience, you're just telling us for the sake of telling us.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Wow, your sarcasm is just amazing. 😐
Cheers, so are your thrilling anecdotes.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Yeah, I think this is a "All women vs. All men" thread.Type: Fist fight.
Location: Earth
Other: 2 days prep time
Now this is interesting. How do you prep for a fist fight? (If martial arts, are kicks allowed? Better for the women if they are) I say, just open the floodgates and let 'er rip.
When I think about women getting prep time...then I get scared.
Originally posted by Devil Kingok, then replace mind control with pussy power
No, those women are stupid because they think they do. They want to say it's a matter of mind, when it's really just a matter of pussy. And that fact is certainly placed squarely at the feet of men who subjugate women and think they are paying them a service by thinking they suddenly deserve some credit for being the weaker half of the species. Well, every aspect of our species deserve credit, based on their equal contributions to our survival.
i was only half serious either way
Originally posted by MindshipAlso, they do have the advantage in numbers, I think.
Now this is interesting. How do you prep for a fist fight? (If martial arts, are kicks allowed? Better for the women if they are) I say, just open the floodgates and let 'er rip.When I think about women getting prep time...then I get scared.
Originally posted by Bardock42
So, what you are saying is that I was absolutely correct?
No. I am saying you knew what I meant. If you want to be right, the you are being right for the sake of being right.
"absolutely" would mean there are not conditions that contradict your point.
Originally posted by Bardock42
More.
I disagree, obviously. I was trying to make more of a point about males vs. females that was in line with inimilst's post yet contradictory. The inimilist's example was to show an "average joe" versus world class female athletes. My example was to show a male athlete vs. the best females athletes in the world. It contradicts his post to a certain extent. Duh.
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Is "you and I both know" the phrase of the day?
Yes. You didn't get the memo?
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Also, no I don't agree, your point would of held validity without having to tell us how amazingly unique you are.
Right. I was pointing out how amazingly unique I am by showing my inferiority DESPITE tough training.
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
The point is not something that is enforced by experience, you're just telling us for the sake of telling us.
Oh really? So how could I have made the point that even a seasoned athlete is inferior to the women? You mean that I would have to use "Joe" from the gym just to avoid appearing narcissistic to a few internet goons?
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Cheers, so are your thrilling anecdotes.
See above, mate.
Originally posted by dadudemon
No. I am saying you knew what I meant. If you want to be right, the you are being right for the sake of being right."absolutely" would mean there are not conditions that contradict your point.
So?
Originally posted by dadudemon
I disagree, obviously. I was trying to make more of a point about males vs. females that was in line with inimilst's post yet contradictory. The inimilist's example was to show an "average joe" versus world class female athletes. My example was to show a male athlete vs. the best females athletes in the world. It contradicts his post to a certain extent. Duh.
Nah, you were trying to make a point about how awesome you are. You do a lot.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Right. I was pointing out how amazingly unique I am by showing my inferiority DESPITE tough training.
Comparing yourself to the very best female athletes isn't saying "I'm an inferior person" all around. Not to mention stating how athletic, powerful and "impressive" you are.
"I was a highly trained athlete. I ran track and filed and played football. I put up some very impressive numbers in power lifting competitions. I would be an example, physically, of a superior male." -Dadudemon
You're not exactly belittling yourself there, champ.
Originally posted by RobtardI disagree. And I also like to state, pointing out how inferior I can be, that I can only take Batman 6 our of 10 times. I am ashamed by it, but I had to tell you guys about it.
Comparing yourself to the very best female athletes isn't saying "I'm an inferior person" all around. Not to mention stating how athletic, powerful and "impressive" you are."I was a highly trained athlete. I ran track and filed and played football. I put up some very impressive numbers in power lifting competitions. I would be an example, physically, of a superior male." <--- You're not exactly belittling yourself there, champ.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Right. I was pointing out how amazingly unique I am by showing my inferiority DESPITE tough training.
Yeah, the only trouble is that you now are an average Joe, you work in I.T, we're not going to see you in the Olympics.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Oh really? So how could I have made the point that even a seasoned athlete is inferior to the women? You mean that I would have to use "Joe" from the gym just to avoid appearing narcissistic to a few internet goons?
Inferior to a woman of world class proportions, that was there simply to make you look good, something you're seemingly addicted to. I have no idea why you raise yourself as a point in every post, presumably a gender debate is about the average of each gender - if you're no average Joe, but in fact an athlete of enormous skill (who does IT work on the side), what do you have to do with this debate?