I disagree. It is better than lets say 3 months ago at least. It had decent discussion, people have fun and drama in the OTF. The trolls are amusing, but get dealt with appropriately. The moderators behave reasonably and leave the users enough space to express themselves. It's in a decent state. Maybe not the most I ever enjoyed it, but certainly not the worst. To me.
Originally posted by Bardock42
I disagree. It is better than lets say 3 months ago at least. It had decent discussion, people have fun and drama in the OTF. The trolls are amusing, but get dealt with appropriately. The moderators behave reasonably and leave the users enough space to express themselves. It's in a decent state. Maybe not the most I ever enjoyed it, but certainly not the worst. To me.
Expand please, what do you feel was limiting discussion previously?
Originally posted by Captain SEXWell, moderaters were much more enforcing in the GDF. You couldn't stroll away from a topic very far and the conversation could not turn too mature. Which was limiting the GDF immensely. But now they take a more lenient approach, which makes sense, especially since the youngest people in the GDF are like 16 anyways. I guess if there was a way to make the GDF for 16 year olds and above, we could altogether be more free here, without the fear that someday someone might decide that PG13 rules have to be enforced for some people. But it is good and fun at the moment, imo.
Expand please, what do you feel was limiting discussion previously?
Originally posted by Bardock42
Well, moderaters were much more enforcing in the GDF. You couldn't stroll away from a topic very far and the conversation could not turn too mature. Which was limiting the GDF immensely. But now they take a more lenient approach, which makes sense, especially since the youngest people in the GDF are like 16 anyways. I guess if there was a way to make the GDF for 16 year olds and above, we could altogether be more free here, without the fear that someday someone might decide that PG13 rules have to be enforced for some people. But it is good and fun at the moment, imo.
What does a 16 year old have to add to a discussion? As a 17 year old they seem very immature to me.
Originally posted by Captain SEXI think basically everyone that can think has something to contribute.
What does a 16 year old have to add to a discussion? As a 17 year old they seem very immature to me.
But sadly, in our societies, including 13 year olds in a discussion, means that you have to exclude certain topics and language. Which shouldn't be necessary imo.
Originally posted by Bardock42
I think basically everyone that can think has something to contribute.But sadly, in our societies, including 13 year olds in a discussion, means that you have to exclude certain topics and language. Which shouldn't be necessary imo.
I agree about language... Tell me what does a 13 year old have to contribute to a discussion on Max Weber?
Re: Re: Re: Re: KMC: How well is it? Generally discuss.
Originally posted by Robtard
The name used escapes me at the moment, but it was the steroid using, ultimate-bodybuilder persona. The avatar had that classic pic of Kirk looking dumbfounded.
Sounds cool... I also lift. Must be a starfleet thing!