POD Bane vs. Kas'im
This thread is made in response to the debate being held in a thread with a different topic. We should continue debating this here.
I'll post my reply again.
Originally posted by Lt. Valerian
You missed his point completely. Kas'im was the better swordsman, there's nothing to it.Let me give you an example: Maul fights Kenobi and Qui-Gon, and both, the pair, and Maul, know absolutely nothing about each other's forms and techniques. The difference here is, Maul has a double-bladed saber, which gives him a slight advantage on one-on-one combat. The Jedi had never fought against something like this before, but the fight was no-where near short. Why? Because even though Qui-Gon and Kenobi were unfamiliar with his technique, they were fine swordsmen, at least very close to Maul's level, and, therefore, were able to compete with him, even individually. On the other hand, Bane gets destroyed when Kas'im switched to his unknown technique.
Bane knows almost everything about his opponent's techniques, which is the only reason why he had the upper hand at the beginning of the duel.
Place a Bane who doesn't know shit about Kas'im's forms and techniques against the Blademaster, and he dies painfully.
Place a Kas'im who doesn't know shit about Bane's forms and techniques, and he annihilates him.