Liz Longhurst vs Porn

Originally posted by WrathfulDwarf
As I mention earlier there has to be a limit as well as a level of responsibility when it comes to the actions.

There should be arbitration...like in Boxing for example...you can beat your opponent so much till the referee says...okay, that's enough...you have a career ahead of yourself. Don't throw it all away in just one fight.

Catching my drift?

Yes, those laws should reflect what they try to prohibit though. And they should never limit freedoms that don't infringe on other humans.

Don't understand how the boxer scenario is an analogy to what we are talking about, though. But, please, don't misunderstand this statement as a request for elaborate details.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I doubt you did.

Either.

Sorry man, but I don't know what you were trying to say.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Don't understand how the boxer scenario is an analogy to what we are talking about, though. But, please, don't misunderstand this statement as a request for elaborate details.

Damn dude, that was harsh. 😬 Syren was right; you don't mince words.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Sorry man, but I don't know what you were trying to say.

Damn dude, that was harsh. 😬 Syren was right; you don't mince words.

So?

How was it harsh? I didn't think it was a good analogy...no harm done.

Also, what I was "trying" to say is very obvious in context. I can make a coloured quote thing again though, if you want.

Originally posted by Bardock42
So?

How was it harsh? I didn't think it was a good analogy...no harm done.

I'm not raggin' on you for it. I like that about you. I was just sayin'..."Duhhaaaaaauhm", when I read your post.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Also, what I was "trying" to say is very obvious in context. I can make a coloured quote thing again though, if you want.

Its simple. I applied the distributive property like so..

does this match with this...

No...probably far from it.

I doubt you did.

No.

Does it match with this?

I was satirizing the fact that you get shit( shifty ) for being German.

I doubt you did.

Not really. It doesn't make sense that you would say "I did you did satirizing the fact that I get shit for being German." If you said, "I doubt you were." I would make more sense to me.

Does it match with this?

I read you complaining about it in the OTF about a week ago.

I doubt you did

Yes. But it doesn't make much sense because I DID read it in the OTF. I couldn't find it. I remember a conversation about it where someone gave you shit about it again and you commented in a sarcastic way. (sounds rather generic, doesn't it?) Regardless, it doesn't make complete sense that you would say that to my post...because you HAVE said it on more than one occasion. If you are saying that you didn't say it in the OTF, great, just splitting hairs. That's not my point.

And what in the world does "either" refer to at the end?

So, you want the post explained or not?