I would like to see the piece of paper that actually says "Reason for Termination: Wizardry".
Sure. Sure. I have no doubt. It's like the recent story that a teacher was having a student run the computer projector for a film he was going to show and the student started "randomly" clicking on files and ended up "accidentally" playing gay porn in front of the whole class. Well, a few of the kids told their mothers, who created a HUGE stink about it and got the teacher in trouble. The majority of the students, apparently, said they thought it was funny. (The guy was the art teacher, they had likely figured out he was gay already) It was only a few parents that really had an issue with the guy being gay, over the trouble making kid who clicked on the file in the first place, that took such huge offense at the situation. Of course, the teacher was a dumbass for using his personal laptop that had such files on it. But anyone on these forums can understand that it was likely much more convenient to use the hardwear that already had the film on it.
But in the case of the topic, it wasn't the students that apparently needed convincing.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Maybe he accidentally just came across it?
Now you're just trying to be subversive.
The student saw an opprotunity and went for it, proving himsef and others right about this teacher.
But, maybe the teacher didn't and this gay teacher tried to screw himself over, in a freudian kind of way. I can't explain it. But what I do know is that children who express a sudden exposure to "adult" themes are rarely guilty of making a stink. Should their parent's shared definition of responsability be propogated, when the children shouldn't have a basis on which to build their objection? A blank slate has not the presence on which to base it's objection, unless it has already been exposed to a measure of objection.
And what's left? I see only my experience. And in my experience, my younger family members only object to the issue when based on what they hear, in church. (REad a proclivity of the older members to seek a solution in their church, which itself professes an all-knowing perspective on every issue) But, by condemning homoseuality in church, you expose (or influence) gay kids to homosexuality. Look at homosexuality in regards to the catholic priesthood. People are raised to think their impulses are un-natural. So, the answer to their un-natural impulses is to join a lifestyle that prohibits sexual consideration. Far too many of which end up molesting children and far too many think their choice to join a sexless institute will counter their impulses. And why focus that effort on children? Because the children are the only members of the "flock" who are most susceptible to the authority granted by such a position.
I know that went way tangental, but it does consider human intent; As well as human inabiltiy to counter intent. ..or desire. Make a man bishop of the diocese and feed him for a day. Make a man bishop of the diocese and ignore his very basic and contradictory hman needs and he'll seek them elsewhere. And don't for one second deny that sex isn't a need. Far too many humans deny that need based on some oppressive religious dontrine.
Re: Teacher fired for performing a magic trick
This reminds me of that episode of The Office where Michael gets reprimanded for using his company credit card to buy an $80 magic kit. He said he bought it to entertain potential clients, so the bottom line was PR. And going off that, I'm sure this guy did the trick to get on the kids' goodside, because kids always pull pranks on the sub.
Originally posted by Devil King
I would like to see the piece of paper that actually says "Reason for Termination: Wizardry".
😂