Originally posted by vlaaad12345It mentions nothing about being depowered. He was simply weaker beneath his armor. Still not enough at all to hang with Galactus. He would need the amp.
It was quite clear he wasnt at his normal full power levels by the guardians comment about him not being fully rebornhttp://img373.imageshack.us/my.php?image=gl020et7.jpg
,was preety damn obvious he wasnt at his full muliverse absorbing strength.
Originally posted by illadelph12
Full power meaning having absorbed all things DC, or full power as in being fully powered by the Anti-Matter Universe? That's a vague comment if a Guardian states it in the arc. The Anti-Monitor from COIE wasn't at "full power" because he hadn't absorbed the last few universes, but he was still above his normal power levels (what he would normally be as just the Monitor of the Anti-Matter Universe) due to absorbing nearly the entire DC Multiverse into himself.PS. what is up with the galactus and marvel wanking? good lord i've never. Next thing you know someone will say galactus can beat the arc angel.
In COIE the Anti-Monitor was amassing more power than he'd normally have and became a threat to all things, that was not his independent power. He was operating under his own power in Sinestro Corps. He hadn't absorbed any of the 52 yet.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Guardians arent impressive in the least.
I'm used to you saying things like that about DC characters. Had it been a marvel character that was so strong that he could hold Superboy prime without him being able to break his grip, you'd be all how uber is this marvel charcter. Or if a marvel character was able to withstand the entropy/antimatter grip, or withstand galaxy destroying blast, then it's a feat. but no matter. you are totally right in having your own opinion. it is yours and yours alone.
Originally posted by fangirl101I like Dc a lot and havent been reading any current marvel titles for ages. Am barely survived the blast. He was damaged bigtime. For as powerful as some claim he is he didnt seem all that impressive. He came to earth with an army and got his ass kicked. Whats impressive? the fact tha he failed to kill Sodom Yat twice?
I'm used to you saying things like that about DC characters. Had it been a marvel character that was so strong that he could hold Superboy prime without him being able to break his grip, you'd be all how uber is this marvel charcter. Or if a marvel character was able to withstand the entropy/antimatter grip, or withstand galaxy destroying blast, then it's a feat. but no matter. you are totally right in having your own opinion. it is yours and yours alone.
Originally posted by quanchi112You may say that all you like but it is clearly obvious that you are biased against DC and towards Marvel. and besides Galactus doesn't have any feats that put him near AM. All that you are arguing is purely conjecture whilst AM has Multiversal feats to back up his side.
I like Dc a lot and havent been reading any current marvel titles for ages. Am barely survived the blast. He was damaged bigtime. For as powerful as some claim he is he didnt seem all that impressive. He came to earth with an army and got his ass kicked. Whats impressive? the fact tha he failed to kill Sodom Yat twice?
Originally posted by SuperherovandalThis isnt coie Am. He doesnt have his amp and because of this he loses.
You may say that all you like but it is clearly obvious that you are biased against DC and towards Marvel. and besides Galactus doesn't have any feats that put him near AM. All that you are arguing is purely conjecture whilst AM has Multiversal feats to back up his side.
