Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
You want them to migrate toward the people they're supposed to overthrow?
Multiple points were made. The particular point that you are referring to is simply moving towards the captial cities, away from the disaster areas. No mention of overthrowing the government. It was almost an aside point..not even the main point.
Originally posted by dadudemonThis has to be one of the most ignorant comments I've seen in a while. And considering this is KMC, well done. 🙂
That was somewhat my point.(Not the direct interpretation of what you said above, but the sarcastic point you were trying to make.) They most certainly do not have the resources to wage war against their own government.However, I would rather die than live in a country that suppressed me and knowingly cause the death of my kinsmen. Maybe its because I hate suppression or maybe its because I am a cynic.
If they are too stupid to do for themselves when nothing else can be done, f*ck 'em. Good riddance.
Originally posted by xmarksthespot
This has to be one of the most ignorant comments I've seen in a while. And considering this is KMC, well done. 🙂
Why thank you.
Do you want to make love now? 🙂
edit-my bad with the whole "evolution" thing.
Originally posted by Schecter
its really the mantra of human garbage. ddm=fail+aids
Do elephants have aids? 😕
Originally posted by jaden101
this will generally show you how effective the UN is in disaster zones
That's interesting and I take your point, but I also think the situation discussed in the first link is something that must happen to nearly all aid agencies. Due to the circumstances of a disaster, complete control over the affects of the aid is unmanageable.
Aiding Burma has no benefit for the US ofcourse they're not going in, it's not sitting on Oil like Iraq..
did i make a booboo?
and please don't say NATO Dont say UN it's America okay, everything is America which is why they are very hated nation..dont get me wrong I DO NOT HATE AMERICA - but in their bid to become a Global Constabulary they are making the worst possible decisions for global stability.
America uses its vast power for invading Iraq for their oil..when it could probably end world hunger in under 5 years..but that would cost more money than it would make.
it's a choice between respect and fear - America chooses to be feared.
2 quotes come to mind when i think of America (as much as i do not hate them)
"Price comes before the fall" Ancient Hebrews
and
"Iron Fists rust" Juken
Originally posted by Juk3n
Aiding Burma has no benefit for the US ofcourse they're not going in, it's not sitting on Oil like Iraq..did i make a booboo?
and please don't say NATO Dont say UN it's America okay, everything is America which is why they are very hated nation..dont get me wrong I DO NOT HATE AMERICA - but in their bid to become a Global Constabulary they are making the worst possible decisions for global stability.
America uses its vast power for invading Iraq for their oil..when it could probably end world hunger in under 5 years..but that would cost more money than it would make.
it's a choice between respect and fear - America chooses to be feared.
2 quotes come to mind when i think of America (as much as i do not hate them)
"Price comes before the fall" Ancient Hebrews
and
"Iron Fists rust" Juken
Was any of the relevant?
ok, so you dont hate america but america is the satan of the world, its all our fault, and we're doomed...but you dont hate america....death to america...god bless america. great
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Was any of the relevant?
of course it was. its all america's fault.
did you see our wicked cool cyclone making machine yet?
Originally posted by Juk3n
Aiding Burma has no benefit for the US ofcourse they're not going in, it's not sitting on Oil like Iraq..did i make a booboo?
and please don't say NATO Dont say UN it's America okay, everything is America which is why they are very hated nation..dont get me wrong I DO NOT HATE AMERICA - but in their bid to become a Global Constabulary they are making the worst possible decisions for global stability.
America uses its vast power for invading Iraq for their oil..when it could probably end world hunger in under 5 years..but that would cost more money than it would make.
it's a choice between respect and fear - America chooses to be feared.
2 quotes come to mind when i think of America (as much as i do not hate them)
"Price comes before the fall" Ancient Hebrews
and
"Iron Fists rust" Juken
it's actually pride comes before a fall
you fail
Originally posted by Juk3n
Aiding Burma has no benefit for the US ofcourse they're not going in, it's not sitting on Oil like Iraq..did i make a booboo?
and please don't say NATO Dont say UN it's America okay, everything is America which is why they are very hated nation..dont get me wrong I DO NOT HATE AMERICA - but in their bid to become a Global Constabulary they are making the worst possible decisions for global stability.
America uses its vast power for invading Iraq for their oil..when it could probably end world hunger in under 5 years..but that would cost more money than it would make.
it's a choice between respect and fear - America chooses to be feared.
2 quotes come to mind when i think of America (as much as i do not hate them)
"Price comes before the fall" Ancient Hebrews
and
"Iron Fists rust" Juken
"Everything is America", what does that mean?
If America invaded Iraq to steal it's oil, why has the price of a gallon of fuel doubled since the war began?
How could America end world hunger in "about 5 years", why is it America's responsibility to end world hunger?
A rusty iron fist can be beneficial, not only can you crush the poor and innocent with that rusty fist, but you can give them tetanus while you're doing it. Seems like a win-win.
Originally posted by RobtardIf America invaded Iraq to steal it's oil, why has the price of a gallon of fuel doubled since the war began?
Without going into some things you would obviously be skeptical about, how would you explain gases prices continuing to rise although the government would tell you we have Iraq under control?
Originally posted by chithappens
Without going into some things you would obviously be skeptical about, how would you explain gases prices continuing to rise although the government would tell you we have Iraq under control?
Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
Greater control over a precious, yet depleting resource.
(Edit: And please don't use the "I won't go into things you're skeptical of", as you don't know what I am and am not.)
Iraq isn't under control and even if it was, America still wouldn't control the oil, we're little more than paid thugs.
I'm not entirely convinced oil is running out or even running low. Who tells us what the "oil crisis" level is at? Big Oil does, and it's in their best interest to have the monopoly on a rare resource than a common one.
Similar in how De Beers controls the price of diamonds. Diamonds aren't rare in the slightest, the Earth makes them constantly, though control the flow in which they're taken out, you control the price at which they're sold.