Originally posted by Silent Master
I hate to break this too you but 1) Gladiator and Hollywood never fought and 2) The Gladiator and Wonder-man fight lasted longer than one panel.
(1) which is why i said the WM v glads fight was the closest ANALOGY. 😐
but it wouldn't matter. unless you have some proof that hollywood>WM. if you do i'd love to see it bcause no one else has ever been able to prove it. (and if it's the "he beat overkill who beat firelord thing, save it. proves nothing. OK was draining FL in that fight so FL was dramatically weakened. hollywood threw a punch and dormammu and was destroyed after that. his only good feat was surviving that explosion. one feat does NOT a character make . . .) but if you have something more definitive i'll gladly concede that hollywood>WM.
(2) it may have. i was being slightly facetious. maybe a page then? a little more with other scenes mingled in? regardless. glads ended it in a hurry. just as superman would do.
Originally posted by quanchi112
They fight in character though.
so the first part about fighting to their fullest abilities doesn't matter?
😂
and yes, there is TONS of proof to show supes using combat speed in battles. so YES it is most certainly in character for him to do so.
this isn't even a fight because hollywood is utterly unproven.
Originally posted by leonidasHe brawls with brawlers. You act as if he is constantly using speed. He doesnt. He might use some speed here but Hollywood will still connect with him and Supes cant put him down. If Kalibak can do it surely Hollywood can knock him silly.
so the first part about fighting to their fullest abilities doesn't matter?😂
and yes, there is TONS of proof to show supes using combat speed in battles. so YES it is most certainly in character for him to do so.
this isn't even a fight because hollywood is utterly unproven.
he's wonderman. in the future. 😐
and quanch -- superman has KILLED kalibak, in the past. you seriosuly don't think superman can put down hollywood?? based on his surviving ONE explosion that was said to be able to take out solar systems but NEVER DID??
all kidding and teasing aside, there really is no point in debating with you if that's the type of stance you choose to take.
using his powers to their fullest (a FORUM RULE) hollywood never touches superman and supes ko's him 10/10.
Originally posted by leonidasWhen did Superman kill Kalibak? Proof?
he's wonderman. in the future. 😐and quanch -- superman has KILLED kalibak, in the past. you seriosuly don't think superman can put down hollywood?? based on his surviving ONE explosion that was said to be able to take out solar systems but [b]NEVER DID
??all kidding and teasing aside, there really is no point in debating with you if that's the type of stance you choose to take.
using his powers to their fullest (a FORUM RULE) hollywood never touches superman and supes ko's him 10/10. [/B]
The point is a Kalibak punch can defeat Superman. Kalibak is a joke compared to most top tiers.
Hollywood has more than enough punching power to down Supes but you havent proven Supes can down Hollywood and you want to take Superman out of character. Sorry nope.
Originally posted by quanchi112
A marvel character.
Great explanation.
Originally posted by leonidas
he's wonderman. in the future. 😐and quanch -- superman has KILLED kalibak, in the past. you seriosuly don't think superman can put down hollywood?? based on his surviving ONE explosion that was said to be able to take out solar systems but [b]NEVER DID
??all kidding and teasing aside, there really is no point in debating with you if that's the type of stance you choose to take.
using his powers to their fullest (a FORUM RULE) hollywood never touches superman and supes ko's him 10/10. [/B]
The new "writer's clause" added by various members means that Superman wins. He's unstoppable, because Joe Casey explained OWAW.
Originally posted by AvlonDo some research on him. He is a guardians of the galaxy character. Its not my duty to inform you about him is it?
Great explanation.The new "writer's clause" added by various members means that Superman wins. He's unstoppable, because Joe Casey explained OWAW.
Again quit taking our arguments out of context. 😉
Originally posted by quanchi112
You twist things and take them out of context I dont. The whole writer thing you keep twisting when we all keep explaining to you the differences.
I believe you're known for that.
Now get your ass back on topic. I came in to ask who this guy was, by Leo's description he doesn't sound impressive so I'm back out. 🙂
Originally posted by AvlonOk. At least you agree you dont know a thing about Hollywood. Hollywood wins as all it takes is a Kalibak punch to beat Supes. 😬
I believe you're known for that.Now get your ass back on topic. I came in to ask who this guy was, by Leo's description he doesn't sound impressive so I'm back out. 🙂
Originally posted by quanchi112
When did Superman kill Kalibak? Proof?The point is a Kalibak punch can defeat Superman. Kalibak is a joke compared to most top tiers.
Hollywood has more than enough punching power to down Supes but you havent proven Supes can down Hollywood and you want to take Superman out of character. Sorry nope.
proof of superman beating kalibak?? you're serious? cripes, he's beat down kalibak AT LEAST twice. hollywood has enough power to beat down supes because kalibak has once been shown able to do so? that abc logic of yours part of that new revolution in debating technique i mentioned before? 😂
i wanna take superman out of character by saying he uses his superspeed? 😐
guess that punch dormmy laid on hollywood that ko'd him was what? greater than the force of a multi-solar system destroying blast?? 😆
you really are too friggin' much . . . i really don't get why anyone would put you on ignore. you're endlessly entertaining! 😄
have a good night, quan. 😉
Originally posted by leonidasYou said he killed Kalibak. There is a huge difference in beating someone and killing someone. 😉
proof of superman beating kalibak?? you're serious? cripes, he's beat down kalibak AT LEAST twice. hollywood has enough power to beat down supes because kalibak has once been shown able to do so? that abc logic of yours part of that new revolution in debating technique i mentioned before? 😂i wanna take superman out of character by saying he uses his superspeed? 😐
guess that punch dormmy laid on hollywood that ko'd him was what? greater than the force of a multi-solar system destroying blast?? 😆
you really are too friggin' much . . . i really don't get why anyone would put you on ignore. you're endlessly entertaining! 😄
have a good night, quan. 😉
Hollywood hits harder is is a lot more durable than Kalibak. It was just a punch and Hollywood hits a lot harder anyways.
Supes rarely uses his superspeed is the point friend. When he battles brawlers he brawls with them.
Leonidas again you seem to argue out of character for Superman. I use canon evidence to prove my points but you tend to stretchthings a bit.
You have a good night as well. 🙂
Originally posted by quanchi112
The point is a Kalibak punch can defeat Superman. Kalibak is a joke compared to most top tiers.
It wasnt his fist. It was a beta club that magnifies his strength. And superman wasnt knocked out. He was dazed. He was also fighting mantis, who has been known to take on hal.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Hollywood has more than enough punching power to down Supes but you havent proven Supes can down Hollywood and you want to take Superman out of character. Sorry nope.
Enough punching power? Just because he hit dormmamu once and got swatted like a fly? Alot of other people have done the same. Hell, superman has hit abstract entities and won. He's hit the am and lost. Beat dominus. Owned death itself. And blitzed darkseid after he beat the source. In half. He blitzed a darksied powerful enough to beat the source in half.
