Entropy vs Galactus

Can Galactus take it?

Let's find out what the general consensus is 🙂

*sigh*............

entropy. abstract beats sub abstract. entropy with genis killed eternity and destroyed everything. then he became the new eternity and recreated everything.

galactus is weak, his purpose is to keep balance between eternity and death, and he himself, does not weild abstract level power.

Galactus has the potential to own Eternity, the UN which Galactus has, shown the ability to destroy the omniverse.

Hold on are we talking about the Abstract Entropy or is this a durability test as to whether Galactus can withstand DC Entropy?

DC entropy

Galactus can definitely survive it. I mean Time Trapper and sundipped Superman did.

Originally posted by llagrok
Can Galactus take it?

Let's find out what the general consensus is 🙂

Originally posted by Badabing
whatdur

durthor I say thee nay, foul modurator!

Originally posted by llagrok
durthor I say thee nay, foul modurator!

Originally posted by Badabing
And I say CLOSING.......ka-dur

But it's not bait, it's DC entropy.

Originally posted by King Kandy
Galactus can definitely survive it. I mean Time Trapper and sundipped Superman did.

Time Trapper IS entropy.......😐

No comment on Supes.

WTF?

Entropy ftw.

Originally posted by Bentley
Galactus has the potential to own Eternity, the UN which Galactus has, shown the ability to destroy the omniverse.

the UN can OWN any1 including galactus. but galactus will never OWN eternity, he only exists to keep BALANCE between the main players eernity and death and is below both.

i didnt know we were referring to dc entropy.

Originally posted by King Kandy
Galactus can definitely survive it. I mean Time Trapper and sundipped Superman did.

I mean if supes can survive it its not that impressive.

The writer explained it. Superman had no limits in that storyline AND he stated Superman was above Galactus.

Yep. He said it because he was explaining the storyline.

His word is law. 🙂

Originally posted by Avlon
The writer explained it. Superman had no limits in that storyline AND he stated Superman was above Galactus.

Yep. He said it because he was explaining the storyline.

His word is law. 🙂

Originally posted by quanchi112
When did he say Galactus? He has no power over Galactus as he is a marvel character. Galactus >Imperiex anyways.

"Who can beat Superman when he goes into that unconscious ‘Probe-busting mode’ as he did in ADVENTURES 594?" And then I threw out the names, and assumed he’d think I was just being silly: RC: Juggernaut? Doomsday? Galactus? No one short of Imperiex himself? * * * * * And then he laid down the law, simple as that. * * * * * JOE CASEY: At that point, Superman is unbeatable.

Nope. You and others debated it to death in the other threads. The writer explained the storyline and said that Superman is unbeatable in that mode. He specifically named Galactus in there too.

This is why I stated originally that it's best to keep this stuff out. You guys insisted differently. Crow must not taste good. 😉

I'm convinced.

Originally posted by Avlon
Nope. You and others debated it to death in the other threads. The writer explained the storyline and said that Superman is unbeatable in that mode. He specifically named Galactus in there too.

This is why I stated originally that it's best to keep this stuff out. You guys insisted differently. Crow must not taste good. 😉

cant you see the difference. You seem so confused all the time.

Galactus>Imperiex who cant even put Superman down when he was sundipped.