Chris Kent vs Sentry

Started by Raoul5 pages

superman has more feats, and is generally considered to be above sentry. burden of proof lies with the sentry supporter, not the superman one...

😬

Originally posted by Creshosk
And then RAOUL challenged you for proof of your claim. and you said that he (Raoul) had to post proof first.

Yes, reading helps. Of course a good part of reading is spelling correctly.

Now then. Back your claims. 🙂

Who said i directed that statement at him, and why do you have to bring spelling up if it has nothing to do with the argument? Of course i spell bad but that doesn't change anything about this so shh...

Originally posted by Raoul
superman has more feats, and is generally considered to be above sentry. burden of proof lies with the sentry supporter, not the superman one...

😬

Superman was also created many many years ago, while sentry is still somewhat new, give him some time 🙁

Originally posted by Flow01
Superman was also created many many years ago, while sentry is still somewhat new, give him some time 🙁

in time he may well eclipse superman, but as it stands now?

Originally posted by Flow01
Who said i directed that statement at him,
Generally speaking when we quote someone we're talking to them. Especially when they're talking to us, now then who did you quote?

Originally posted by Flow01
[QUOTE=10775258]Originally posted by Raoul
[B]proof?

Proof that it isnt false? I dont think you can prove superman > sentry, why should i have to prove something if you put no proof forward in the first place [/B][/QUOTE]

Oh look Raoul's name is in the box of the person you quoted...

Originally posted by Flow01
and why do you have to bring spelling up if it has nothing to do with the argument?
You brought up reading, I brought up Spelling.

Originally posted by Flow01
Of course i spell bad but that doesn't change anything about this so shh...
Right it doesn't. You made a claim, and were challenged, and like the typical sentry fan when challenged you dodge rather than answer the challenge. 🙂

Originally posted by Flow01
Superman was also created many many years ago, while sentry is still somewhat new, give him some time 🙁
Translation: "I have no proof that puts him on par with Superman. I have no evidence to back my claims."

🙂

cresh, cool it... 😛

Originally posted by Creshosk
Generally speaking when we quote someone we're talking to them. Especially when they're talking to us, now then who did you quote?

Proof that it isnt false? I dont think you can prove superman > sentry, why should i have to prove something if you put no proof forward in the first place

Oh look Raoul's name is in the box of the person you quoted...

You brought up reading, I brought up Spelling.

Right it doesn't. You made a claim, and were challenged, and like the typical sentry fan when challenged you dodge rather than answer the challenge. 🙂 [/B][/QUOTE]

ummmmm, misquote? duh, they are very common y'know? 🙄

Originally posted by Raoul
cresh, cool it... 😛
Okay fine, I'll leave him alone.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Okay fine, I'll leave him alone.

Yeah, thats right, walk away.... Sentry > superman 😈

Originally posted by Flow01
Yeah, thats right, walk away.... Sentry > superman 😈
Okay. Now you've made a very positive assertation. PROVE IT.

You don't have any excuses, any weaseling now that you have made that claim.

Originally posted by Flow01
Sentry > superman

Burden of proof is squarely on your shoulders. Where shall we begin? Energy Durability? Superman absorbed enough energy to destroy a galaxy and was unphased when he drained the meggadon war head. Sentry couldn't stand up to WWH.

Physical durability? Superman had a casual chat with an alien inside of a double black hole. That's the pull of not one but two black holes. Sentry couldn't stand up to WWH.

Speed? Suiperman traveled millions of light years in less than three hours. What does Sentry have that compares to this?

Your turn bucko.

Sentry is about 8 years old 😐 nowhere near new.

Originally posted by NiñoAraña
Sentry is about 8 years old 😐 nowhere near new.

That is new, compared to how long superman has been out...

Originally posted by Creshosk
Okay. Now you've made a very positive assertation. PROVE IT.

You don't have any excuses, any weaseling now that you have made that claim.

Burden of proof is squarely on your shoulders. Where shall we begin? Energy Durability? Superman absorbed enough energy to destroy a galaxy and was unphased when he drained the meggadon war head. Sentry couldn't stand up to WWH.

Physical durability? Superman had a casual chat with an alien inside of a double black hole. That's the pull of not one but two black holes. Sentry couldn't stand up to WWH.

Speed? Suiperman traveled millions of light years in less than three hours. What does Sentry have that compares to this?

Your turn bucko.

I would argue but im playing css before i get tired... And dont even bring WWH into this....

Originally posted by Flow01
I would argue but im playing css before i get tired... And dont even bring WWH into this....
Excuses, excuses. The feats don't exist to put sentry anywhere near Superman.

All that excess energy Hulk and Sentry were spitting at each other and the planet was fine. Hell there was a lot of collateral damage but the city was fine.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Excuses, excuses. The feats don't exist to put sentry anywhere near Superman.

All that excess energy Hulk and Sentry were spitting at each other and the planet was fine. Hell there was a lot of collateral damage but the city was fine.

WOW thats how you judge power? GOOD JOB!!!! 🙄

Originally posted by Creshosk
Excuses, excuses. The feats don't exist to put sentry anywhere near Superman.

All that excess energy Hulk and Sentry were spitting at each other and the planet was fine. Hell there was a lot of collateral damage but the city was fine.

The city really wasn't fine Cresh. Superman has fought Darkseid, and it did not destroy the planet or an entire city, so bringing up destruction isn't really fair. Was it possible for WWHulk, and Sentry to destroy an entire city? Yes WWHulk could have done that by himself, issue 5 of WWHulk confirms this.

I don't think Sentry however has enough showings yet to make him Superman's superior. He certainly won't be beating someone that dwarves Superman either.

Collateral damage should almost never be used in deciding fights. Let's not even talk about cities or planets getting destroyed as collateral damage of heavyweight bouts, because how many times have we seen "galaxy-destroying" attacks that do not even destroy clothing?

Originally posted by CaptainStoic
The city really wasn't fine Cresh.
Was it a big smoking crater in the ground with all the population dead?

Originally posted by CaptainStoic
Superman has fought Darkseid, and it did not destroy the planet or an entire city, so bringing up destruction isn't really fair. Was it possible for WWHulk, and Sentry to destroy an entire city? Yes WWHulk could have done that by himself, issue 5 of WWHulk confirms this.
Well Its that I was slightly titchy over memories of debating with fans of another series that claims great power but doesn't match the hype. but yeah, you're right he could have destroyed the city.

Originally posted by CaptainStoic
I don't think Sentry however has enough showings yet to make him Superman's superior. He certainly won't be beating someone that dwarves Superman either.
have to agree with you there.

Chris Kent?

Maybe Sentry can take 4/10.