Batman 3's Villain will be Baaaaane!

Started by Devil King18 pages

Re: Batman 3's Villain will be Baaaaane!

Originally posted by Starscream M
Here is why:

1. No penguin....danny devito's penguin was iconic, Nolan won't touch it...also penguin isn't intimidating enough for bale batman

Nicholson was so not iconic that Nolan wouldn't refuse to touch it, but DeVito is off limits? A breakdown in logic from the get-go.

Originally posted by Joker1237
Twoface is not part of the big 4. Though out Batman's history the top 4 villians were Joker, Penguin, Riddler and Catwoman(Before she was revamp), Than after that, the rest of villians Twoface, Ivy, Scarcrow follow them.

Dude what? You think the Penguin is more of a major player in Batman stories than Two Face? Are you a Batman fan at all?

Originally posted by xNIXSONx
as for Reaper, Hush and all em, are they known enough by general people to be satisfied?

Well Rhas wasn't very well known to the general public either.

Originally posted by Bat Dude
Um... No...

The Reaper...

'Nuff said...

Seriously man. What is it with you and The Reaper? That's all you seem to mention in every batman thread here. What makes you think he'd be more interesting than villains like The Riddler or Catwoman?

My opinion on Bane - I don't like hiim as the villain for the third movie. To me, he just isn't interesting enough. I just finished re-reading the whole "knightfall" story again, and I was more interested in whenever Batman came across random villains like Firefly and Zsaz.

How interesting could Nolan make a roid raging giant?

I wanna see Riddler done in a serious tone. I think Nolan should be the one to give an awesome Riddler.

Re: Batman 3's Villain will be Baaaaane!

Originally posted by Starscream M
Batman 3's Villain will be Baaaaane!

Here is why:

7. No rha's al ghul...I just didn't like his portrayal by Nesson.

😆

Apparently Nolan considers Starscream's opinion.

Lol, why would Ra's even be on the list when he was blown to bits? Even the Lazarus Pit wouldn't save him because he was blown so sky high.

1. Bane as 'dumb muscle' was one of the (many) problems with the Schmuck's films.

2. Bane could very easily be realistic. Make 'Venom' a government super-steroid project gone wrong. I don't find that too unrealistic for Nolanverse.

3. Knightfall is one of the only storylines that has a hope of living up to The Dark Knight. Most anything else will be a disappointment.

I hope to see Bane or the Riddler brought in as Nolanverse's next villain. Perhaps with Catwoman as a side villain/love interest/something.

Originally posted by xNIXSONx
exactly. Bane is just a muscle, a henchmen. steroids or probably be some performance enhancing drug.

No hes not he figured out Batmans true identity and came up with a plan to break him.

Originally posted by Phantom Zone
No hes not he figured out Batmans true identity and came up with a plan to break him.

i didnt read up on bane, but its these schumacher films that is making it very difficult to imagine these villains in nolanverse

k i wikied bane and it said Bane took down drug lords, and sometimes had the backin of batman. that would be interesting.

Originally posted by xNIXSONx
i didnt read up on bane, but its these schumacher films that is making it very difficult to imagine these villains in nolanverse

k i wikied bane and it said Bane took down drug lords, and sometimes had the backin of batman. that would be interesting.

Like I said, theres only 2-3 people that can get to Batman and thery are Joker, Bane and Hush. Forget Riddler he's a 2nd rate back up villain.

Originally posted by Quincy
Seriously man. What is it with you and The Reaper? That's all you seem to mention in every batman thread here. What makes you think he'd be more interesting than villains like The Riddler or Catwoman?

1. He's new to the general public: A lot of people in the general public don't know about him, thus, don't know what to expect from him... Giving the film a new layer of suspense that guys like Riddler couldn't supply...

2. Rachel is based on a comic character named Rachel Caspian, who just so happens to be Judson Caspian's daughter... You know who Judson Caspian is? That's right, he's The Reaper... After Gotham went to hell in Begins and Rachel

Spoiler:
died by the Joker's hand in TDK
he'd have a reason to return to Gotham after a lengthy retirement in Europe...

3. The main part of the story in the next one is Batman being on the run and proving he isn't a murderous vigilante... What better way to prove he's truly Gotham's guardian than by stopping a murderous vigilante, in this case, The Reaper?

4. He's an awesome visual, awesomer than Riddler for sure (maybe not Catwoman, but then again, who's a better visual than Catwoman? 😉 )

See for yourself:

And I remember reading somewhere that Nolan liked the character, and he used bits and pieces of the comic Year Two and it's sequel, Full Circle, in Begins (Joe Chill gets killed before Bruce can kill him, Rachel, Bruce throws the gun in the river, etc.) So it's not all that far fetched to think he'd use the villain in the next one...

Originally posted by xNIXSONx
i didnt read up on bane, but its these schumacher films that is making it very difficult to imagine these villains in nolanverse

k i wikied bane and it said Bane took down drug lords, and sometimes had the backin of batman. that would be interesting.

Forget schumacher. The film is based on the comic and if you read what Bane was like in the comics he would fit perfectly in Nolanverse

Originally posted by Phantom Zone
Forget schumacher. The film is based on the comic and if you read what Bane was like in the comics he would fit perfectly in Nolanverse

its just schumach tainted my judgement, and the first thing that came to mind when i thought of Bane was that lol. But if he is as smart and strategic as he's supposed to be, he could work.

and to bat dude

3. there is already a murderous vigilante on the loose, Two Face. there is no way he's gone. "but but i thoguth he was dead?" "no. half."

Hmmm, I just read through Reaper's story. Not bad I suppose. I'd be a little bummed if he was the villain strictly because I like all of the others more.

But if they do use the reaper, they should have established his character as Rachel's father already.

Originally posted by xNIXSONx
and to bat dude

3. there is already a murderous vigilante on the loose, Two Face. there is no way he's gone. "but but i thoguth he was dead?" "no. half."

But the people don't know Harvey's a murderous vigilante... That's the whole reason he's taking the blame for Harvey's crimes... If he just showed up and gunned a person down, people would be like "Yo man, you lied to us!" and then rally around Batman again... That would make no sense... All that covering up would be for nothing... Not to mention it would be bad writing and very anti-climactic...

Reaper also has ties to Rachel, remember...

Originally posted by Bat Dude
But the people don't know Harvey's a murderous vigilante... That's the whole reason he's taking the blame for Harvey's crimes... If he just showed up and gunned a person down, people would be like "Yo man, you lied to us!" and then rally around Batman again... That would make no sense... All that covering up would be for nothing... Not to mention it would be bad writing and very anti-climactic...

Reaper also has ties to Rachel, remember...

people will know that their beloved D.A. is merely half dead corrupt bastard killing mobsters. That will throw the city back to sh*t knowing this. He doesnt just gun down anyone, he's smarter than that, and he'll leave his choices to the coin whether he kills or not, plus he already took out

Spoiler:
the detecs that got bought out by malroni and sal himself
im guessing he's gonna go to bruce wayne next, cuz Rachel told Harvey TWICE that Bruce is someone that she can trust and then she was on the sh*t end of the other phoneline and
Spoiler:
and got blown to chunks
Theres something personal that stems there. Bruce will probably say he would never do something to put rachel in harms way, and maybe even confess that he loved her, and theres some sh*t to go down, if you found out your dead girlfriend was still hanging around her ex while you were seeing her and he possibly had a helping hand in her demise, man....

Vin Diesel as Bane??? just pump him up and he's not a bad actor. Plus chicks love him so he's good for sales. He also has a cool voice.

http://www.tomsgames.com/us/fringedrinking/riddick1.jpg

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b266/ambuscade/Other%20Stuff/Chronicles_Riddick_handcuffs_L.jpg

Originally posted by Endrict Nuul
Vin Diesel as Bane??? just pump him up and he's not a bad actor. Plus chicks love him so he's good for sales. He also has a cool voice.

http://www.tomsgames.com/us/fringedrinking/riddick1.jpg

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b266/ambuscade/Other%20Stuff/Chronicles_Riddick_handcuffs_L.jpg

😆 lmfao

ooooh man that is classic. K he does have a cool voice. IRON GIANT, but Diesel is second rate to Chuck Norris 😉

why not get Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson 🙄

The Rock is a great actor, but when it comes to comic characters, ya gotta think logically with the casting. Neither the Rock nor Vin Diesel would be right as Bane. They'd get laughed at so hard it'd be ridiculous.

Originally posted by Da Joker
The Rock is a great actor, but when it comes to comic characters, ya gotta think logically with the casting. Neither the Rock nor Vin Diesel would be right as Bane. They'd get laughed at so hard it'd be ridiculous.

what about that dude Nathan Jones, the giant guy from The Protector, and Troy, he shouldve been the juggernaut in X3

Maybe Juggernaut but not Bane.