Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Yeah, and it's totally up to you to decide who should die, however trivial the reason may be, right?
No, but should the option ever fall in my hands and a person's life hang in the balance, I'll make sure to do the right decision. I'd never spare a rapist or a child molester.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
It's called a penal system, it's what we use to incarcerate these offenders.
And what? Let them rot in jail cells at the expense of all the tax payers? F*ck that, execute them, makes more space for new criminals and costs less to keep him fed and living, but that's my take on it, please don't argue with it. I'm just saying that should a person who's murdered dozens came to me, and I have the option of seeing him flee because he has rights, I'd off him. Sorry if you think it's wrong, but what can ya do?
You're also missing my point. I didn't state that ALL offenders should be killed. I said that some people deserve death. Don't go assuming all the time like you usually do.
Originally posted by Storm
As taxpayer, it costs you far more to execute an individual than it would to incarcerate for life without parole.Ceterum censeo OTF esse delendam.
Do you have a source for that? I think you're wrong.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Do you have a source for that? I think you're wrong.
I know I have a solution how it'll be cheaper.
Scha-wing!
Originally posted by Scythe
I know I have a solution how it'll be cheaper.Scha-wing!
I think the major costs of the death penalty are the legal costs. It costs more in the short term. In the long term, it can be much less costly.
If someone has to serve life in prison, then one could argue that it is more humane to just kill them. One could also argue that it is more humane to let them live because of rehab and the further good they could do.