Originally posted by Robtard
Batman Forever was written horribly throughout, it was a pure-shit movie. If he had been in this movie, with this "more serious" script, he could have done at least an equal job, with a high chance of it being better, as he's the better actor.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Sadly that was to play the worst Two Face imaginable and ruin as much of the Batman franchise as possible.
Ruin the franchise? All of the Batman movies are cartoonish and hard for me to take seriously. Whether its the Penguin, Riddler or either Joker, their attempts be serious make me laugh. But I do think that Eckhart was the better Two-Face.
Originally posted by Quiero Mota
Ruin the franchise? All of the Batman movies are cartoonish and hard for me to take seriously. Whether its the Penguin, Riddler or either Joker, their attempts be serious make me laugh. But I do think that Eckhart was the better Two-Face.
And I think it is undeniable that Forever at least marked the start of the ruin of the franchise. Being cartoonish is not a problem, being absolutely ridiculous and stupid (and also out of character) is one.
Originally posted by Quiero Mota
How was Batman Forever any stupider than the first two?
Good question, oh right it had a ridiculous Joker wannabe as Two Face...Jim Carrey as a very flashy Riddler (who also wanted to be the Joker), a very undark and horribly miscast Batman, a plot that could make you wish you would have choked on your vomit when you first heard it.
Oh yeah..and Robin. Not like in the comics ... an actually gay Robin.
God that movie was bad.
Originally posted by Da Joker
I never said he was a great actor because he's been in a high grossing movie, so you're an idiot for not reading the entire statement.You guys are funny. 🙂
Oh that's right, you said I had to be in an equally high grossing film to judge his capabilities. Do I have to point out why that is stupid?