Off Topic Circle Jerk

Originally posted by focus4chumps
list a single solitary valid contribution that quanchi has made to thread/topic?

since there are "just too many to list", and i dont want to burden you with the pressure of having to pick a favorite out of so many...pick one at random. 🙂

🙂

Originally posted by dadudemon
This is too vague. Define what you mean by "a single solitary valid contribution that quanchi has made to thread/topic".

This question also deals not in fact but in subjectivity which is not the original topic being discussed.

Whew, glad I asked! I should have known you wanted something else entirely. 🙂

🙂

well if you're too ignorant to know what a "valid point" is,
how do you feel that you are qualified to spot and count them? 🙂

Originally posted by focus4chumps
well if you're too ignorant to know what a "valid point" is,

I guess I am too stupid/ignorant to know what you meant by "a single solitary valid contribution that quanchi has made to thread/topic"

So, if you could, define that, explicitly and without ambiguity for my dumb little brain? Please? 🙂

Originally posted by focus4chumps
how do you feel that you are qualified to spot and count them? 🙂

If you succeed in addressing the first section, then this second section, here, is invalid and irrelevant, now isn't it?

[QUOTE=14331656]Originally posted by dadudemon
[B]I guess I am too stupid/ignorant to know what you meant by "a single solitary valid contribution that quanchi has made to thread/topic"

So, if you could, define that, explicitly and without ambiguity for my dumb little brain? Please? 🙂

If you succeed in addressing the first section, then this second section, here, is invalid and irrelevant, now isn't it?

ddm's thought process:

Originally posted by focus4chumps
normal thought process:

ddm's thought process:

I appreciate you telling me I am intelligent and am capable of complicated thought.

Originally posted by dadudemon

awww for moi? i'm flattered. 😍

got any funny ones? 🙂

Originally posted by dadudemon
That's not true: you specifically asked, "What valid points has he made?" You did not ask, "What valid pionts has he made: list just a few?"

But I refuse to answer you question as you can just as easily answer the compliment to that set: "list just a few."

It is a troll question.

You won't answer it and, instead, want to play a game. No thank you: you can taking your stupid game somewhere else! 😄

If you were objective and genuine, you would not have any need to ask such a question. The fact that you asked it means you're either an idiot or just trolling (because you clearly want to argue). Hint: you're not an idiot.

Edit - Do you think he was wrong about every single point he made? Answer this question: don't avoid it.

As you still haven't answered my question, I'll just have to assume that you can't list any.

Originally posted by Silent Master
As you still haven't answered my question, I'll just have to assume that you can't list any.

Nor have you answered any of mine. Too bad: you tried to troll but failed. 🙂

Sucks when someone sees when you're trolling, doesn't it? Kind of takes the wind out of your troll sails?

Regardless, you can still get an honest answer out of me. Just go back and read my posts to see how. 🙂

So are you trolling or are you genuinely interested, still?

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
You aren't even in your own.

(Unless your head=your arse, of course.)

Originally posted by focus4chumps

Originally posted by Silent Master
He seems to be under the impression that quantity = quality.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Everyone hates Quanchi because he argues well enough to make you guys have to respond and debate him. Haters gonna hate. 🙂

Haters(he adds nothing to the debate)various hater responses: you are a clown, your stupid, how dare you gimp Vader, random spam images of clowns, etc.

Then they have the nerve to say I ruin threads despite their spam images and say I'm ruining he threads.

Ps. Silent Master has never actually debated anything and is known for this on herochat. You've got his number.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Nor have you answered any of mine. Too bad: you tried to troll but failed. 🙂

Sucks when someone sees when you're trolling, doesn't it? Kind of takes the wind out of your troll sails?

Regardless, you can still get an honest answer out of me. Just go back and read my posts to see how. 🙂

So are you trolling or are you genuinely interested, still?

Seeing as this exchange was started when you refused to answer my question, your demand that I answer your questions first is an obvious troll tactic.

typical clown tactic. realizes he's made an ass of himself, so when called on it, assures everyone that he was just trolling

and that you need to calm down.

balloon animals available on request.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
typical clown tactic. realizes he's made an ass of himself, so when called on it, assures everyone that he was just trolling

and that you need to calm down.

balloon animals available on request.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Seeing as this exchange was started when you refused to answer my question,

Wrong, it started when you got butthurt about my post, quoted it, and posted your troll question.

Originally posted by Silent Master
...your demand that I answer your questions first is an obvious troll tactic.

No, it is putting a troll back in his place. If you were not trolling and were genuinely interested in discussion, you'd have gladly answered my questions of both clarification and supplication. You didn't, dodged, farted, butthurt yourself, and whined some more.

Here's the deal: half of the problems with these Quanchi wank-fests are you and others being idiots-morons-butthurt-obsessed-bored-raging-wrong.

You can choose what the other half is (regarding Quanchi), of course. 🙂

Originally posted by quanchi112
Ps. Silent Master has never actually debated anything and is known for this on herochat. You've got his number.

I've known Silent Master to be the troll that he is the moment he stepped into these threads and started exuding his rubbish all over the threads. He's been a troll from day 1.

Unlike focus4chumps, he adds no humor, no content, and no enjoyment with his trolling. He's a shitty and boring troll: the worst kind.

Incorrect, I questioned a statement that you made and rather than answer the question you went the troll route.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Wrong, it started when you got butthurt about my post, quoted it, and posted your troll question.

No, it is putting a troll back in his place. If you were not trolling and were genuinely interested in discussion, you'd have gladly answered my questions of both clarification and supplication. You didn't, dodged, farted, butthurt yourself, and whined so more.

Here's the deal: half of the problems with these Quanchi wank-fests are you and others being idiots-morons-butthurt-obsessed-bored-raging-wrong.

You can choose what the other half is (regarding Quanchi), of course. 🙂

I've known Silent Master to be the troll that he is the moment he stepped into these threads and started exuding his rubbish all over the threads. He's been a troll from day 1.

Unlike focus4chumps, he adds no humor, no content, and no enjoyment with his trolling. He's a shitty and boring troll: the worst kind.

people who call ddm out for making a wild ass of himself are apparently "trolls".

intentionally flooding topics with convoluted illogical gibberish and other clownish tools of obvious avoidance....not trolling. its called being "factually correct"

Originally posted by focus4chumps
people who call ddm out for making a wild ass of himself are apparently "trolls".

intentionally flooding topics with convoluted illogical gibberish and other clownish tools of avoidance in dialogue....not trolling. its called being "factually correct"

^

Penis.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
people who call ddm out for making a wild ass of himself are apparently "trolls".

intentionally flooding topics with convoluted illogical gibberish and other clownish tools of obvious avoidance....not trolling. its called being "factually correct"