Off Topic Circle Jerk

Originally posted by Robtard
Here you are projecting again. I don't hate you, I find your clowning amusing and why I mock it, which is what you rely on to declare baseless victories as noted:

*say something stupid and//or wrong*

*someone mocks and/or corrects you*

*claim you trapped them and declare victory*

Protip: Trolling is getting the other person upset, not getting yourself upset to the point you have to resort to taking personal jabs at their wife and kids 🙂

Originally posted by MF DELPH
You're an idiot.

I didn't mock the new Star Trek films, I'm mocking [b]YOU. You have a short attention span and have shown to jump to whatever character is trending at the moment, which right now is Khan because of the new Star Trek film. You'll have a Superman sig soon, then a Thor or Kurse sig depending on how Dark World plays out, and whatever character looks good in the next LotR film sig, and so on and so on. I'm surprised you didn't rock a Jaden Smith set for After Earth.

Your argument is hollow and your position that a person can't enjoy all of the Trek and needs to draw a line in the sand and cast insults at the original series and TNG based material is moronic. Magnified exponentially by the fact that you, on several occasions, have admitted that you haven't even watched the series you're criticizing, and are basing your opinion on the couple of movies you saw. I, on the other hand, have stated on several occasions that I enjoyed the new movies, and I enjoyed the TV series and some of the older films (not all of them were good). Not being a fanatic like you doesn't mean I disliked the new films, it just means I'm sane and not a rabid bandwagon jumper.

This conversation is over. [/B]

After Earth sucked. I love movies and comics more than you. You've had one sig for years. You're embarrassing and kind of pathetic tbh. One sig. Lol. Hahahahahahaha.

I saw the movies and enough episodes to realize what they are about. Boredom galore. I won't just say I like all Star Trek because I love NuTrek more than you do.

You're a giant hypocrite. You're also the same idiot who used to cry for McNabb after I correctly labeled him as the choke artist he is.

Keep crying over me liking NuTrek more and how its only shiny and new but you still like it. You're quite foolish and a disgrace to Trekkies everywhere.

Cry elsewhere.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I am not upset and always debate when being debated against. If you want to go the personal route then I respond in kind. I always win no matter how we play it.

Because I tried attacking you with "your wife!" and "your kids!" comments? Nope 🙂

But please, continue flipping it like you're not upset and you're the poor victim, that's always fun 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
Because I tried attacking you with "your wife!" and "your kids!" comments? Nope 🙂

But please, continue flipping it like you're not upset and you're the poor victim, that's always fun 🙂

Originally posted by quanchi112
You started it in the Zan thread. Don't cry because you can't handle it. I can play it any way you want it, bro.

"No you!!!111!1" *stamps little feet*

Should be easy for you to post the quote where I attacked your wife and kids first (or at all) then 🙂

Proceed 🙂

It's funny that this forum always thrives when it has an arch enemy to antagonize.

What was the last ones name again. I forget.

Edit- Ahhh yes RogueJedi.

There is a difference between thriving and active. trolls increase a board's activity in the short term, but they certainly don't help a board thrive.

Originally posted by focus4chumps

thank you ddm for your confession of baseless slander. 🙂

Let it be known that this is a lie as he stately rather directly about his troll-escapade mission for KMC and has talked about it on multiple occasions. Quanchi's name has come up twice, that I have seen.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
i suspect the preceding will come in handy next time you do your silly clown dance of "i never said that clown "

I suspect that you will continue to lie about your trolling missions, deny truths stated about that, and troll KMC until you're banned. hmm

However, you could prove me wrong. You might actually become a decent contributing member of KMC.

^

😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

Originally posted by Robtard
Here you are projecting again. I don't hate you, I find your clowning amusing and why I mock it,

See, I told you, Quanchi. 313

Seems only Darkstorm actually hates you.

Originally posted by Silent Master
There is a difference between thriving and active.

From a site admin's perspective, as long as the "trolling" doesn't drive away members, it is thriving.

The moment that troll starts to drive away members is the moment "active" does not equal "thriving." More activity means more hits on google (that's just how it works). For example, when Rogue Jedi and I were arguing about John Preston from Equilibrium, this site was one of the only few sites on the internet with in depth discussion, analysis, and debate regarding that movie and character. It showed up in the front page results. That's awesome and great from a site admin's perspective.

Originally posted by Silent Master
trolls increase a board's activity in the short term, but they certainly don't help a board thrive.

Disagreed. It depends on the troll. While Chillmeistergen may have offended some people with his acidic posts, at times, he also had a degree of attractiveness to his posting style that kept a few members around...until he was banned. It could also have been the "straw that broke the camel's back" when Chill was banned. But it seems that it really does depend on the troll or troll's posting style.

Originally posted by Robtard
"No you!!!111!1" *stamps little feet*

Should be easy for you to post the quote where I attacked your wife and kids first (or at all) then 🙂

Proceed 🙂

Originally posted by the ninjak
It's funny that this forum always thrives when it has an arch enemy to antagonize.

What was the last ones name again. I forget.

Edit- Ahhh yes RogueJedi.

Shame as these comments won't even bother him. Oh well.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I don't have a wife or kids. I also never attacked with of them just you. Relax. Enjoy the board.

So once again you make some BS accusation and take the "I'm the poor victim" stance, but back down when challenged to support your claims.

I enjoy this board every time I'm on; you don't see me raging and getting personal, that's your little monkey 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
So once again you make some BS accusation and take the "I'm the poor victim" stance, but back down when challenged to support your claims.

I enjoy this board every time I'm on; you don't see me raging and getting personal, that's your little monkey 🙂

Don't turn into Rogue --what's his name again ?

Originally posted by quanchi112
I am no more a victim than you or anyone else who engages in these sort of posts. You need to take ownership and quit being so sensitive.

Don't turn into Rogue --what's his name again ?

Keep trying to deflect that you just cornered yourself again with yet another BS claim and flipped about when challenged 🙂

The way you constantly try and troll RJ into him giving you his attention is both equal parts sad and hilarious. Grow up already 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
Keep trying to deflect that you just cornered yourself again with yet another BS claim and flipped about when challenged 🙂

The way you constantly try and troll RJ into him giving you his attention is both equal parts sad and hilarious. Grow up already 🙂

Ninjak forgot his name.

😂

That was hilarious. He's soft. Who cares ? People barely even remember him.

Originally posted by dadudemon
From a site admin's perspective, as long as the "trolling" doesn't drive away members, it is thriving.

The moment that troll starts to drive away members is the moment "active" does not equal "thriving." More activity means more hits on google (that's just how it works). For example, when Rogue Jedi and I were arguing about John Preston from Equilibrium, this site was one of the only few sites on the internet with in depth discussion, analysis, and debate regarding that movie and character. It showed up in the front page results. That's awesome and great from a site admin's perspective.

Disagreed. It depends on the troll. While Chillmeistergen may have offended some people with his acidic posts, at times, he also had a degree of attractiveness to his posting style that kept a few members around...until he was banned. It could also have been the "straw that broke the camel's back" when Chill was banned. But it seems that it really does depend on the troll or troll's posting style.

look at the silly failtroll trying to justify his own existence here.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
look at the silly failtroll trying to justify his own existence here.

You're coming off as trying too hard but falling on your face with weak troll attempts.

Quote the same post but post something better. You can do it because I have seen better.

Originally posted by dadudemon
You're coming off as trying too hard but falling on your face with weak troll attempts.

Quote the same post but post something better. You can do it because I have seen better.

its not a troll attempt. im just calling you what you are.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
its not a troll attempt. im just calling you what you are.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
are you sure you want to keep up this obvious trolling, especially considering your poor success rate?

I know you are but what am I?