Off Topic Circle Jerk

Started by Lestov161,317 pages

It would take me a grand total of 5 minutes (if I'm struggling) to do what Focus is asking. Just do that, DDM, and then not only can you prove the post is real, but you can beat focus at his own game by using his method to expose him. Again, none of your privacy is violated, it will only take a few minutes. It's a flawless plan.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
keep evading ddm. even your pals are shaking their heads. not your day i'm afraid ❌

Yeah, offering to give away my password so someone can check my PM list is so very evasive, eh?

Just not me day, eh?

Eh?

Originally posted by dadudemon
I could just forward you the PM.

But...reply to it?

Why?

To prove it's real. I could link you to a fake PM, but if you can't reply to it, it proves that it is fake.

Why not reply? How much extra effort would it take?

PM forwarding only utilized the quote function

Originally posted by Lestov16
...obviously easy to forge. nice try ddm 🙄
Originally posted by Lestov16
It would take me a grand total of 5 minutes (if I'm struggling) to do what Focus is asking. Just do that, DDM, and then not only can you prove the post is real, but you can beat focus at his own game by using his method to expose him. Again, none of your privacy is violated, it will only take a few minutes. It's a flawless plan.

I'll be honest: I didn't even read his list of items because I think he's just being a douche. He'll add more stuff later, no doubt. He's changed what he wants me to do two or three times, now. He's just trolling. I prefer to stick with my second idea. I originally offered to record it with my cellphone but then edited my post to say FRAPS and here's why:

FRAPS has a higher resolution so people could take screen caps and compare them to check for forgeries. It's also much harder to emulate something like a FRAPS result...I think we're getting into drivers and writing my own program.

But, he if wants a cellphone recording, I can do that: WHEN I GET HOME.

Do you want me to forward the PM to you? I can do that, now. Since you've already seen it, I don't think it is breaking any rules.

Originally posted by Lestov16
To prove it's real. I could link you to a fake PM, but if you can't reply to it, it proves that it is fake.

Why not reply? How much extra effort would it take?

I still don't get how this is an effective method: focus has already shown he can shop a PM from me very quickly.

So why would I reply to the PM? He can shop whatever he wants and promise to be honest, all day.

Edit - You can't link to PMs, by the way.

Originally posted by dadudemon

But, he if wants a cellphone recording, I can do that: WHEN I GET HOME.

why do we have to wait? 🙂

did you leave your phone at home? 🙂

Originally posted by focus4chumps
why do we have to wait? 🙂

did you leave your phone at home? 🙂

I'm at work...in a secure environment...where cellphone recording is strictly prohibited.*

Or did you forget I have a job that requires a security clearance?

Must be another one of my lies, right? Derp.

*I'm not going to get fired and lose my security clearance simply because you are a douche-nugget. You can wait until I get off of work and get home.

Hell, I probably won't even have time tonight to do this bullshit adventure for you: I have contractors at my home, renovating the master bathroom.

I understand you can't provide the proof this exact second, but the manner in which you are going to provide the proof later is flawed. You want to show the post and then go the KMC homepage. That proves a grand total of jack shit. At the very least, you have to reply to the topic. Using FRAPS, your phone, whatever, you have to AT LEAST reply to the topic to prove it's authenticity.

Originally posted by Lestov16
I understand you can't provide the proof this exact second, but the manner in which you are going to provide the proof later is flawed. You want to show the post and then go the KMC homepage. That proves a grand total of jack shit. At the very least, you have to reply to the topic. Using FRAPS, your phone, whatever, you have to AT LEAST reply to the topic to prove it's authenticity.

Reply to what topic?

This thread? While video recording?

That could work.

But this is getting more and more convoluted. It would be far easier to just give my password to someone that can be trusted.

Robtard, get your shit in here.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I still don't get how this is an effective method: focus has already shown he can shop a PM from me very quickly.

So why would I reply to the PM? He can shop whatever he wants and promise to be honest, all day.

Edit - You can't link to PMs, by the way.

You don't have to reply so Focus will respond. You have to reply so WE CAN SEE YOU REPLY. You don't have to reply jack shit to Focus. You just have to click "reply" so we can see that the function is possible.

Originally posted by dadudemon

Hell, I probably won't even have time tonight to do this bullshit adventure for you: I have contractors at my home, renovating the master bathroom.

interesting how you had all this time available to do your single specified method.

now all of the sudden you're booked for the rest of the week when this would take you literally seconds to accomplish. 🙂

interesting indeed 🙂

lol

Just asked my boss if I could record my screen with my cellphone: he said yes as long as it had nothing work related.

This may take a bit to record, upload, and post.

BRB!

🙂

Originally posted by focus4chumps
interesting how you had all this time available to do your single specified method. now all of the sudden you're booked for the rest of the week 🙂

Who said anything about a week? Just tonight...maybe tomorrow. The upload and post is what takes the longest: not the actual recording.

Didn't think this one through, did you? You'll get 'em next time, champ.

Originally posted by Lestov16
You don't have to reply jack shit to Focus. You just have to click "reply" so we can see that the function is possible.

he knows this. he's just pretending not to.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
ok how about this. very easy:

1-***keep the browser url in video frame so we can see.***

2-copy the url of my apparent pm to your clipboard

3-load cnn.com (because it has animations on the front page)

4-after page loads, paste PM url into address bar and load PM page (as long as you are signed in to kmc, this will work. i just did it)

5-scroll down and hit 'send reply', so we can see the reply window.

and 6: [b]do this using your cellphone camera to record. (holding the cellphone in your hand)

🙂 [/B]

Originally posted by focus4chumps
he knows this. he's just pretending not to.

No, I think I get it, now.

He wants me to click "reply" to see if the reply function works in the VIDEO. The way I understood it, he just wanted me to reply to you...which is why I thought it was dumb because you'd just shop something else.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Reply to what topic?

This thread? While video recording?

That could work.

I obviously meant "reply to the PM"

Originally posted by dadudemon
But this is getting more and more convoluted. It would be far easier to just give my password to someone that can be trusted.

Alright dude. You can go the password route, but there was nothing wrong, convoluted, or even remotely difficult about what Focus suggested.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Robtard, get your shit in here.

He'll be here soon. Then we can settle this once and for all.

Originally posted by focus4chumps

Originally posted by dadudemon
lol

Just asked my boss if I could record my screen with my cellphone: he said yes as long as it had nothing work related.

This may take a bit to record, upload, and post.

BRB!

🙂

Originally posted by dadudemon
No, I think I get it, now.

He wants me to click "reply" to see if the reply function works in the VIDEO. The way I understood it, he just wanted me to reply to you...which is why I thought it was dumb because you'd just shop something else.

well now you know, and knowing is half the battle.

remember. keep the url in frame. follow the instructions precisely. (thats why i quoted them again)