Off Topic Circle Jerk

Started by Stealth Moose1,317 pages
Originally posted by The Scenario
What is? That the scene doesn't actually show what you think it should?

The scene is only meant to be taken literally when Khanchi wants it to be taken literally. Otherwise, one is supposed to infer meaning that best jives with his argument.

Originally posted by Supra
But everyone else can call me names.

No, they can't. That's why I made a statement in the "#1 Douche" thread when people were mentioning you and told them to cease.

Originally posted by Impediment
Stop the name calling right now, Supra. It's not necessary.
Impediment.

Originally posted by The Fat Rambo
Why do you try so hard?
This comes naturally to me.

Originally posted by The Scenario
What is? That the scene doesn't actually show what you think it should?
It did show that. The naysayers such as yourself are acting ridiculous.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It did show that. The naysayers such as yourself are acting ridiculous.

What did it show again? Because I'm sitting on a pile of .gifs that are making the "everything Khan pointed at died" and "100% accuracy" statements increasingly indefensible.

Originally posted by The Scenario
What did it show again? Because I'm sitting on a pile of .gifs that are making the "everything Khan pointed at died" and "100% accuracy" statements increasingly indefensible.
Khan did eradicate the Klingons and spared the Enterprise crew to get his men back.

Just concede to Khan.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Khan did eradicate the Klingons and spared the Enterprise crew to get his men back.

Just concede to Khan.

He did so with neither 100% accuracy nor killing every Klingon he fired at. Which is the real issue here, as no one ever denied that he won the fight.

Originally posted by The Scenario
He did so with neither 100% accuracy nor killing every Klingon he fired at. Which is the real issue here, as no one ever denied that he won the fight.
Your obsession with making baseless claims is duly noted but he won the fight in convincing fashion.

Originally posted by Supra
But everyone else can call me names.

Arguing with a mod isn't a very good idea.

Originally posted by quanchi112
baseless claims
Originally posted by quanchi112
You never showed him miss. We need to see him fire and clearly miss his intended target. Your claim which you have failed to prove.
Originally posted by quanchi112

Khan did kill every person he intended to kill.

I'm not making any claims. I'm simply pointing out how ridiculous your stance is.

All you have to do is admit that Khan missed at least a few shots, and this whole thing ends.

Khan is an genetically enhanced being though and his weapons outclass yoda. Light sabers can block blaster fire but that anti-ship weapon he had was a different story, if yoda try's to block that fire power with his light saber it will not deflect it will explode on impact.

Yoda will then die.

Khan clearly not missing the Klingon in the way back because his intended target was the wall 🙂 *does clown flips*

Originally posted by Robtard
Khan clearly not missing the Klingon in the way back because his intended target was the wall 🙂 *does clown flips*

Your point there is mute and does not prove anything.

Originally posted by Supra
Your point there is mute and does not prove anything.

1) Stop trolling in EVERY post

2) It proves Khan missed shots and can miss 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
1) Stop trolling in EVERY post

2) It proves Khan missed shots and can miss 🙂

You don't even know the definition of a troll, but again I will look it up for you, your problem is you can't debate anyone without calling them a troll or calling them a retard.

"In Internet slang, a troll (/ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people,[1] by posting inflammatory,[2] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a forum, chat room, or blog), either accidentally[3][4] or with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[5] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion."

^^Point out above what I am doing qualifies as a troll. I am debating a topic. How is any of it extraneous, or off topic or inflammatory? You calling me a retard is inflammatory and are deliberately trying to provoke me into a emotional response. which disrupts normal ontopic discussion. So in fact you in fact are a trolling.

Back on OP, just because can miss what does that prove?

Originally posted by Robtard
1) Stop trolling in EVERY post

2) It proves Khan missed shots and can miss 🙂

1) It's what he does.

2) Only to those that have actually seen the movie.

Originally posted by Supra
You don't even know the definition of a troll, but again I will look it up for you, your problem is you can't debate anyone without calling them a troll or calling them a retard.

"In Internet slang, a troll (/ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people,[1] by posting inflammatory,[2] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a forum, chat room, or blog), either accidentally[3][4][b] or with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[5] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion."

^^Point out above what I am doing qualifies as a troll. I am debating a topic. How is any of it extraneous, or off topic or inflammatory? You calling me a retard is inflammatory and are deliberately trying to provoke me into a emotional response. which disrupts normal ontopic discussion. So in fact you in fact are a trolling.

Back on OP, just because can miss what does that prove? [/B]

Blah, blah, blah. Guess not.

Just that Khan can miss, if you have some issue with that, please direct the rage towards the nearest wall. If not, good, glad you accept that Khan can miss and the issue is settled.

Originally posted by Supra
Back on OP, just because can miss what does that prove?

Really, it just proves he can miss. Which is all I'm trying to prove.

Quan has repeatedly claimed that Khan has 100% accuracy and never missed what he aimed at. I'm simply trying to dispel that notion.

Originally posted by The Scenario
Really, it just proves he can miss. Which is all I'm trying to prove.

Quan has repeatedly claimed that Khan has 100% accuracy and never missed what he aimed at. I'm simply trying to dispel that notion.

Ok he missed but how does that prove without a doubt Khan now loses because of a shot missed?