Originally posted by quanchi112
My will to dominate my enemies does make me quite great. All great people have an OCD which drives them. That explains why you're so sub par at debating.
As soon as your done sucking your own baby batter off, we'll continue. OCD is not a great thing BTW, it's a disorder for a reason.
Originally posted by quanchi112
No, it makes people great when applied correctly. Perfectionists have ocds but it makes them greater at what they do.
You've never applied anything correctly in your life though, I wouldn't trust you to sit the right way on a toilet seat.
That's what makes your OCD so bad, is that because of it, you can't see that you are wrong almost always, and because of it, you continue to fight your losing battles LONG after they ceased being relevant.
Any of the Van Zan threads is more than enough ample proof of this.
Originally posted by quanchi112
No, it makes people great when applied correctly. Perfectionists have ocds but it makes them greater at what they do.
morons love to pontificate over how OCD is simply a condition being unusually clean and organized.
as far as the truth of OCD, they can't be enlightened because they're morons who regard every guess they make as 'fact'. right quanchi?
Originally posted by Darkstorm ZeroThat is the difference between you and I. You're the kind who needs to be told exactly how to do something and wants someone else bossing you around.
You've never applied anything correctly in your life though, I wouldn't trust you to sit the right way on a toilet seat.That's what makes your OCD so bad, is that because of it, you can't see that you are wrong almost always, and because of it, you continue to fight your losing battles LONG after they ceased being relevant.
Any of the Van Zan threads is more than enough ample proof of this.
I march to the beat of my own drum.
I support my opinion with evidence unlike so many on here who just tend to get emotional.
I definitely won that thread. The other thread which spawned as a means of it is further evidence I was deep inside people's heads.
Originally posted by focus4chumpsThat is what drives people to be great. Obsessing over something otherwise they would be ordinary. It's what separates the great ones from people such as yourself.
morons love to pontificate over how OCD is simply a condition being unusually clean and organized.as far as the truth of OCD, they can't be enlightened because they're morons who regard every guess they make as 'fact'. right quanchi?
I support my opinion with evidence unlike yourself.
Originally posted by quanchi112
That is what drives people to be great. Obsessing over something otherwise they would be ordinary. It's what separates the great ones from people such as yourself.I support my opinion with evidence unlike yourself.
you've only presented evidence that you have no idea what OCD is, you ignorant braying ass.
Originally posted by quanchi112
That is the difference between you and I. You're the kind who needs to be told exactly how to do something and wants someone else bossing you around.
What an amusing and inaccurate statement, but it is in line with the rest of your skewed views.
Go ahead and explain who is giving me the order to argue with you then? Or, even better, why I can walk away from a debate with you because it's like trying to talk to a rock?
Originally posted by quanchi112
I march to the beat of my own drum.
You march to the beat of your own hand on your dick more like.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I support my opinion with evidence unlike so many on here who just tend to get emotional.
No, because any potential evidence you use gets horribly skewed. Not to mention that evidence produced by yourself is so rare that people are more likely to encounter Bigfoot in Manhattan.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I definitely won that thread. The other thread which spawned as a means of it is further evidence I was deep inside people's heads.
See? Skewed. Not only did you fail, you didn't even try to debate beyond trolling tomfoolery and your OCD problem.
quanchi has narcissistic personality disorder for certain, highlighted by his glowing ignorance and laziness to conduct even the simplest research, and obvious evasive clown tactics when he's painted himself in a corner...however i'm not sure about quanchi having OCD
...though how can one really determine that from posting habbits?
...though how can one really determine that from posting habbits?
...though how can one really determine that from posting habbits?
...though how can one really determine that from posting habbits?
...though how can one really determine that from posting habbits?
Originally posted by focus4chumps
quanchi has narcissistic personality disorder for certain, highlighted by his glowing ignorance and laziness to conduct even the simplest research, and obvious evasive clown tactics when he's painted himself in a corner...however i'm not sure about quanchi having OCD...though how can one really determine that from posting habbits?
...though how can one really determine that from posting habbits?
...though how can one really determine that from posting habbits?
...though how can one really determine that from posting habbits?
...though how can one really determine that from posting habbits?
Any psychological assessment you make of anyone, ever, I automatically discard. Those are most assuredly wrong if you make them.
😮💨
Originally posted by Darkstorm ZeroIf it was truly like debating with a rock wouldn't any post directed at me be idiotic on your end ? So basically you like to argue with what you deem rocks. You try to be popular on here and desperately want people to like you. Obvious is obvious.
What an amusing and inaccurate statement, but it is in line with the rest of your skewed views.Go ahead and explain who is giving me the order to argue with you then? Or, even better, why I can walk away from a debate with you because it's like trying to talk to a rock?
You march to the beat of your own hand on your dick more like.
No, because any potential evidence you use gets horribly skewed. Not to mention that evidence produced by yourself is so rare that people are more likely to encounter Bigfoot in Manhattan.
See? Skewed. Not only did you fail, you didn't even try to debate beyond trolling tomfoolery and your OCD problem.
Says the guy who tries citing the book feats and break the rules.
Incorrect.
Rock beats scissors. I win again.