Off Topic Circle Jerk

Started by Time Immemorial1,317 pages
Originally posted by Lestov16
It's not hypocrisy. Here is why
Epicurus trolled. He got banned
Focus trolled. He got banned.
Supra trolled. He got banned.
Quan trolls worse than any of them. He gets virtual immunity.
Since Quan does not receive a just punishment from the mods (who admits he troll), it is up to us to exact retribution upon him. This is why he is the exception to the rule of trolling. There is no other way to teach him.

Ok so its forum vs Quan, now I get it. 😆

TBF, I told him in a PM to put those he dislikes on ignore as an alternative to reporting them.

Originally posted by Tattoos N Scars
You like Quan, so that statement makes no sense.

He only dislikes certain hypocrites/trolls....I believe there is a term used to describe people that use such double standards 🙂

Originally posted by Silent Master
He only dislikes certain hypocrites/trolls....I believe there is a term used to describe people that use such double standards 🙂

You being the main one.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Ok so its forum vs Quan, now I get it. 😆

Pretty much. Unless you think a guy who believes a metahuman can beat Sith lords deserves to be respected as a credible debater, which, if so, brings your own credibility into question.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Pretty much. Unless you think a guy who believes a metahuman can beat Sith lords deserves to be respected as a credible debater, which, if so, brings your own credibility into question.

I think it has some relevance, if Boba Fett can put on a good show and evade a Jedi Master, it makes a good debate to say a metahuman could as well who was much better feats. Since the fights are hypothetical in nature, you have to find something to base an opinion off of.

Originally posted by Lestov16
TBF, I told him in a PM to put those he dislikes on ignore as an alternative to reporting them.

report me for what, though? lol

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
I think it has some relevance, if Boba Fett can put on a good show and evade a Jedi Master, it makes a good debate to say a metahuman could as well who was much better feats. Since the fights are hypothetical in nature, you have to find something to base an opinion off of.

That is a straw man generalization of metahumans and ignores several variables and factors that will be present and absent in the fight.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
report me for what, though? lol

Doesn't make sense. He didn't ignore me and I flamed him a few times.

Originally posted by Lestov16
That is a straw man generalization of metahumans and ignores several variables and factors that will be present and absent in the fight.

I don't get that term but how else do you base a forum fight without taking into consideration all showings of feats vs on screen feats of similar nature.

Just from observation of a battle that took place on screen was Jango vs Obi. Neither side really won or lost. So then one looks at Khan and his feats and I would say his rival Jango's in skill and feats so then by inference, you could base a fight off Khan vs Obiwan, or Khan vs Anakin. Thats how I look at it at least. If thats wrong, so be it, however thats my opinion, and since its all hypothetically, no one is necessary correct as its all opinion on theory's.

But some opinions are better than others.

more like some opinions are grounded in logic, reason, and evidence, while others are grounded in fandom, wishes, fallacy, and lots of glitter

Originally posted by focus4chumps
ddm is attempting to claim the ability to objectively name-call,

Come now...surely you don't actually believe this strawman of yours when I outright stated my position is a logical fallacy?

Originally posted by Tattoos N Scars
Why do you even care about me trolling Quan? I never bothered you before yesterday. Does he give you good head or something?

June 20th

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f102/t597314.html

Really? Bet you forgot this one where I decided to ignore you and give you the benefit of the doubt. So the "before yesterday I never bothered you" part is a lie. I'm sure you will try and weasel and jimmy you're way out of this one, but if you chose to say "hey I fcked up, lets call it even" Then so be it.

TE, want some solid and free advice?

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
June 20th

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f102/t597314.html

Really? Bet you forgot this one where I decided to ignore you and give you the benefit of the doubt. So the "before yesterday I never bothered you" part is a lie. I'm sure you will try and weasel and jimmy you're way out of this one, but if you chose to say "hey I fcked up, lets call it even" Then so be it.

I don't mind calling it even with you. Honestly, I forgot I even posted that. However, that really wasn't anything. Our beef didn't really start until yesterday, when Bada had to get involved.

Originally posted by Tattoos N Scars
I don't mind calling it even with you. Honestly, I forgot I even posted that. However, that really wasn't anything. Our beef didn't really start until yesterday, when Bada had to get involved.

Ok its squashed bro :cheers:

Originally posted by Tattoos N Scars
However, that really wasn't anything. Our beef didn't really start until yesterday, when Bada had to get involved.

Oh really? Link?

Edit - Found it:

Originally posted by Badabing
The only reason I'm replying to you both is because I received a PM. This is Impediment's forum and I don't like stepping on another mod's toes. I suggest you both use the ignore function. I have reasons beyond you both bickering to justify temp bans. You both know what I'm talking about.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Oh really? Link?

Find it yourself ninny🙂

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Find it yourself ninny🙂

Did, check above. 🙂