Originally posted by TheLordofMurderKelvin Khan is a different Khan from a different timeline you moron.
Nope...Future Spock tells current Spock that they were able to defeat Khan...but at a great cost.
Future Spock doesnt tell current Spock what that cost was though...
And that is directly from Into Darkness...
🙂
Originally posted by quanchi112
It was common sense but J just proved it, dummy. It's like talking to a kid. A very, very, very dumb kid.
You didnt prove a dam thing...
Your words arent worth duck water...
So all of this 'Kelvin Khan' stuff is you making something up to fool people so they can believe Khan is something that he's not...
Thats pathetic even for you...
Khan is weak...
The Khan that dies at the end of Wrath of Khan is the same as that is feature in Into Darkness and you have no proof to suggest otherwise...
🙂
Originally posted by TheLordofMurderProved it, dumb troll.
You didnt prove a dam thing...Your words arent worth duck water...
So all of this 'Kelvin Khan' stuff is you making something up to fool people so they can believe Khan is something that he's not...
Thats pathetic even for you...
Khan is weak...
The Khan that dies at the end of Wrath of Khan is the same as that is feature in Into Darkness and you have no proof to suggest otherwise...
🙂
Originally posted by quanchi112
Proved it, dumb troll.
You proved nothing, while the below is the truth:
You didnt prove anything as what the director says doesnt count...
Inside the movie itself (which does count), Future Spock confirms to current Spock that they will eventually defeat Khan at a great cost (Spocks life) which fits in exactly with the Wrath of Khan...
Thus your Kelvin Khan not being "the Wrath of Khan" Khan is Bulls!t...
Khan's fate is as the below and there's nothing within Into Darkness to dispute it...
Originally posted by TheLordofMurderThat is Spock dealing with his Khan from another reality whose experiences are different. Dumb as **** that LoM guy.
You proved nothing, while the below is the truth:You didnt prove anything as what the director says doesnt count...
Inside the movie itself (which does count), Future Spock confirms to current Spock that they will eventually defeat Khan at a great cost (Spocks life) which fits in exactly with the Wrath of Khan...
Thus your Kelvin Khan not being "the Wrath of Khan" Khan is Bulls!t...
Khan's fate is as the below and there's nothing within Into Darkness to dispute it...
Originally posted by TheLordofMurderDifferent Khan you idiot.
You just dont want to accept the fact that Khan's fated to turn into a Crispy Critter!!😂
💃
http://io9.gizmodo.com/the-alternate-star-trek-timeline-of-the-new-movies-fina-1782687811
Originally posted by quanchi112
Different Khan you idiot.http://io9.gizmodo.com/the-alternate-star-trek-timeline-of-the-new-movies-fina-1782687811
Fail...
Thats not from within the movie...
Only stuff from within the movie counts and you know it...
You just trying deny the fact that Khans body will one day be burned to a crisp...
🙂
Originally posted by TheLordofMurderhttp://io9.gizmodo.com/the-alternate-star-trek-timeline-of-the-new-movies-fina-1782687811
Fail...Thats not from within the movie...
Only stuff from within the movie counts and you know it...
You just trying deny the fact that Khans body will one day be burned to a crisp...
🙂
The first film already explained the alternate reality but this is official. This is also official you're an idiot.