United States Presidential Election 2008 - Official Discussion Thread

Started by KidRock143 pages
Originally posted by Devil King
Well, if you don't want the coloureds knocking on your door, come to take your monies, you best vote for Obomber. See, everyone who votes for him is sent an email explaining that he will not be taking their money; just the people's money who didn't vote for him.
Originally posted by inimalist
wow, socialism and wealth redistribution don't mean what they used to...

I didnt say he was a socialist in that post.

Strange though that you two would automatically think socialist after reading what I pasted. Had I actually said socialism, then ok, but I didnt mention it yet your brain just read it and thought of socialism.

edit: All while not addressing the points at all and

I was actually questioning anyone who thinks Obama's plans represent anything close to socialism or real wealth redistribution.

If you aren't saying Obama's plans are socialist or represent real wage redistribution, then that was not addressed to you.

Socialism was mentioned at least in the post 2 before mine 😉

So how does everyone feel about giving 400 billion dollars to people who pay no taxes?

how does everyone feel about giving 700b to the richest people in the country...

or is it only "wealth redistribution" when it goes rich to poor?

sorry guys. 😮

Originally posted by inimalist
how does everyone feel about giving 700b to the richest people in the country...

or is it only "wealth redistribution" when it goes rich to poor?

I-i was against it 😐

😛

Originally posted by inimalist
how does everyone feel about giving 700b to the richest people in the country...

or is it only "wealth redistribution" when it goes rich to poor?

I was unaware it was only the rich that used banks in this country and defaulted on mortgages..I guess only the rich depend on IRA's as well that are tired into the mortgages.

And well you tell me how you feel..good old Obama supported the bailout...or does he support the rich over the poor now?

So how does everyone feel about giving 400 billion dollars to people who pay no taxes?

Originally posted by KidRock
I didnt say he was a socialist in that post.

Strange though that you two would automatically think socialist after reading what I pasted. Had I actually said socialism, then ok, but I didnt mention it yet your brain just read it and thought of socialism.

edit: All while not addressing the points at all and

Funny, I can't find the word "socialist" in my post. Who's brain is leaping to conclusions?

Originally posted by Devil King
Funny, I can't find the word "socialist" in my post. Who's brain is leaping to conclusions?

Wrong quote, you're not worth replying to.

Originally posted by lord xyz
I don't think anyone denied Obama is for redistribution of the wealth.

What it is is you believe Obama to be a socialist, and since you watch FOX, you associate that with evil and stupid, even though socialism isn't a bad idea.

Originally posted by KidRock
Wrong quote, you're not worth replying to.

That's what I thought, *****! Thanks for the response anyway.

Originally posted by KidRock
Wrong quote, you're not worth replying to.
But, but...

Originally posted by KidRock
I didnt say he was a socialist in that post.

Strange though that you two would automatically think socialist after reading what I pasted. Had I actually said socialism, then ok, but I didnt mention it yet your brain just read it and thought of socialism.

edit: All while not addressing the points at all and

Originally posted by Devil King
That's what I thought, *****! Thanks for the response anyway.

Easy old timer

Originally posted by KidRock
Easy old timer

Just zip it and grab your ankles, sonny.

Originally posted by KidRock
So how does everyone feel about giving 400 billion dollars to people who pay no taxes?

No one supports that, so it doesn't matter.

Originally posted by BackFire
No one supports that, so it doesn't matter.

so the Washington Post article is lieing?

Originally posted by KidRock
lieing?

How's that college education working out for you?

Dunno what article you're referring to. But if it's suggesting that Obama wants to give money to people who don't pay any taxes it's factually incorrect.

Nevermind. Found your link. They're correct, however you are lying/incorrect when you say they pay no taxes. The link, and the segment you highlighted said INCOME TAX. There are other taxes people pay who don't pay income tax. Payroll tax is a tax every worker pays, period. So they are paying taxes, unless you think payroll tax isn't a tax.

Originally posted by BackFire
Dunno what article you're referring to. But if it's suggesting that Obama wants to give money to people who don't pay any taxes it's factually incorrect.

Nevermind. Found your link. They're correct, however you are lying/incorrect when you say they pay no taxes. The link, and the segment you highlighted said INCOME TAX. There are other taxes people pay who don't pay income tax. Payroll tax is a tax every worker pays, period. So they are paying taxes, unless you think payroll tax isn't a tax.

Still..why are we just giving them money if they are working a job..why am I paying income taxes and payroll taxes and getting nothing back while they pay no income taxes and get money back.

They refer to it as "cuts in payroll tax". they pay no income tax and now their payroll tax is getting cut..and the people receiving these benefits already contribute nothing in comparison to other people now they will be paying EVEN LESS, if this is even possible. As well as recieving all the benefits of Obamas new social programs like UHC while contributing nothing.

Obama's tax plan is fair, not socialist- fair.

But to be quite honest, capitalism isn't about fair.