Originally posted by inimalist
Russia's stated military policy is to use nuclear weapons against nations with greater military technologyeven if one believe your claim about France, England and Germany, there is no reason to remove nuclear arms from the equation, which GREATLY tip the favor for Russia
Yes. But do you actually believe they would be thick enough? Me, I rate them more intelligent than that.
You have to take out nukes in the equation of any war now because the use of such would be as detrimental to the country who uses them. Nuclear arms are way beyond the Hiroshima bomb. No country is dumb enough to use them.
Originally posted by inimalist
also, France, the who has the largest army of the 3 you mentioned (and of any NATO country excluding USA, and of EU nations excluding Turkey) has roughly a quarter the size of the Russians (active troops). Looking at total troops, it jumps to almost 1/5.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_active_troops
Size doesn't really matter now, and Russian numbers are also inflated by the government.
[QUOTE=10958884]Originally posted by inimalist
[B]plus, France is not America. America's military policy is to stay at least a generation ahead of all nations, meaning that France's technology is probably not that much better than the Russians.
Considering the Eurofighter and the FAMAS along with military tech that US shares with its allies are greater than what the Russians have, I believe France are ahead.
Originally posted by inimalist
[B]Wiki lays out the basics of each wing of both the French and Russian militaries. Just having a quick look, France would be ****ED
Wiki isn't reliable exactly reliable in war. It can't take into account unmeasurables like leadership and morale.